Waryle

Macron is turbo economical liberalism, and he does everything he can to not be affiliated with the left.

He even dissolved the Assemblée Nationale (our Parliament), and when a left-wing coalition came out on top, which should have secured them the prime minister’s seat, Macron delayed the appointment for months trying to buy time for the right to secure an agreement with the far right, and ended up choosing a prime minister from a right-wing party who did had only 7% of votes.

yes, lower even than an analogue bike, because the electric motor is more carbon efficient than human muscle power which requires eating more.

Everytime I saw this claim, it ended up being bullshit. What’s your source?

They don’t

That’s not brain drain. Brain drain is when high qualified people leave their country, mostly because of the lack of infrastructures costing them opportunities for studying or working in their respective field.

What you’re talking about is capital flight. This is an issue that is systematically raised as a counter-argument by liberals in debates on taxation. The problem is that it is seriously overestimated:

• Leaving a country is a lot more complicated than it sounds: you lose your family, your friends, your culture, your habits. Many millionaires who leave their country end up coming back after a few years.
• You can’t relocate your real estate investments.
• Going abroad doesn’t exempt you from paying taxes (especially exit taxes).
• A country that wishes to do so can prohibit the relocation of a profitable company, or even nationalize it.
• Many rich people who threaten to leave if taxes are raised end up doing the math: if there’s a profitable business, they’ll stay. And in a country that finances its infrastructure soundly and has a good distribution of wealth, there’s profitable business to be had.

While true, how is that any different to the arguments that were used for TV?

Television is bad because it is a passive activity, but it is less harmful than the continuous ingestion of micro-videos. But I don’t see what it has to do here.

Additionally, Lemmy is a social network in the same way that Reddit is. Is this not also dangerous?

What’s the connection? I didn’t mention Reddit.

As has been the recommendation for practically everything for the four decades I’ve been on this earth, moderation is key. Instead of hating new media, either regulate it (if the evidence is truly that great) or treat it with healthy moderation.

This would be to ignore the particularly addictive nature of this kind of content. It would be like comparing apples to Snickers: both are sweet, yes, but one is much more problematic.

Let’s be blunt here. Most of the people in this thread aren’t worried about health

That could be a point, but I’m pretty sure that if you ask anybody, the main reason given would be that it makes you stupid. But I can agree that this opinion would not necessarily be based on anything other than the eternal contempt for novelty as video games or manga were, for example, before they became popular.

ITT: People in their mid-twenties or later, who feel superior to those that like one form of media over their preferred media.

You’re just waving away an important fact, which is that shorts and their equivalents are notoriously known for killing attention spans and disrupting the management of dopamine in the brain, causing depression in particular.

We are no longer simply in the traditional custom of the elderly who despise the activities of the younger generations, we are talking about health.

Hexgears and of course lemmygrad.ml are of the same kind

I can shit inside a car and make it unbearable for everyone, that does not make me the one who controls the car.

There is a colossal difference between “the government CONTROLS the weather” and “the government participates in climate change”

• Those are tires, not wheels.
• 35% which uses them means that 65% don’t use them.
• You said “no matter gear you have”, so you can’t use that point.
• With 20cm of fresh snow, even a normal car would be stuck. But if you tell me that you use a special car (a pick-up for example), I will argue that you can use a special bike (such as a fat bike) and roll with it without problem.

And we could save a lot of people if they put on helmets to walk down stairs, and yet I don’t see anyone saying that people are stupid not to wear them.

And your friend, if he drives at 30mph, of course he has to wear a helmet, but the subject is not a sporty practice of cycling, but bike commuting. And helmets does not protect you from a shitty infrastructure and tank-like cars that run you over, so maybe it would be good to stop insulting people and bring some nuance to this debate.

Guess dutch people are stupid, but at least they have way less death per kilometer while cycling ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Finnish children cycle to school

J’ai été voir et :

Ctrl + F “nucléaire” -> Pas de mention de sortie, juste l’arrêt de la fusion de l’ASN et de l’IRSN qui est une évidence

Ctrl + F “Ukraine” -> Rien

Putain ils l’ont fait les cons, ils ont réussi à faire un programme en sortant les points vraiment clivants. Je vais pouvoir voter sans un seul petit remord, enfin

Ah oui les fameux gens de gauche qui votent Le Pen uniquement parcequ’ils n’aiment pas la personnalité de Mélenchon. A moins que tu ne parles maintenant plus des gens qui veulent voter à gauche mais de la population générale ? Je ne suis pas sûr de te suivre mais je crois que tu changes de sujet.

J’ai pas dit “gens de gauche”, j’ai dit, je me cite : « Pour tous ceux qui ne sont pas des partisans LFI et qui cherchent qui voter à gauche »

J’ai fait exprès de choisir soigneusement mes termes, merci de ne pas les déformer. Et si tu doutes qu’ils existent, je rappellerai qu’il y a eu 17% de report de voix depuis LFI vers le RN au deuxième tour de 2022, donc des gens qui hésitaient entre Mélenchon et Le Pen au premier tour, ça doit bien exister.

Ton sondage montre juste que les gens dans cet échantillon ont d’abord choisi sur 1) le programme et 2) Les chances de passer au second tour. Il demande les motivations principales de leur vote, pas si ils aiment Mélenchon.

La ligne qui nous intéresse, c’est « La personnalité du candidat », et Mélenchon est avant-dernier ex-æquo avec Hidalgo, et à peine au-dessus de Jadot. Ça veut dire que même parmi ses propres votants, Mélenchon n’est pas populaire, alors maintenant imagine sa popularité chez les votants d’autres partis et les abstentionnistes.

Et puis bon, c’est gentil les concours de popularité mais à ce jeu là Roussel serait devant tout le monde à gauche. Ce qui nous intéresse les plus c’est les élections et, en l’occurrence, le constat est clair : les électeurs de gauche on massivement voté Mélenchon, par adhésion à ses idées.

Bah oui, c’est exactement ça, ils ont voté massivement Mélenchon, par adhésion aux idées de LFI (bon score sur la première ligne), par vote utile (bon score sur la troisième ligne), mais malgré le candidat (mauvais score sur la deuxième ligne).

comme la sortie du nucléaire ou “le refus de l’escalade de la guerre en Ukraine”

Mais au secours putain

T’as un gros problème de logique là, être le premier parti de gauche ça ne prouve pas que LFI n’aurait pas pu faire mieux sans Mélenchon (= qu’il n’est pas un repoussoir), et ça ne prouve absolument pas que tous la quasi-totalité des non-partisans de LFI qui cherchent un candidat valable à gauche ont voté pour lui.

Dans ton raisonnement, tu occultes tous les votants qui ont voté dans d’autres partis par dépit, dont un nombre significatifs se reportent même à l’extrême droite, et tu occultes les abstentionnistes qui ne se sont pas déplacés faute de candidat valable.

Regarde la gueule de certains sondages, c’est flagrant que beaucoup votent LFI malgré Mélenchon, il a la même popularité que Hidalgo parmi leurs votants respectifs.

Je veux bien que tu m’expliques le rapport là. La seule chose que ces chiffres montrent, c’est que LFI a eu le plus de votes parmi les partis de gauche, et ce n’est pas ce que tu as prétendu.

Source ?