This comes off weird. Especially when in context to the post.
This comes off weird. Especially when in context to the post.
Why would anyone go to COPS? It’s just a meeting for the world’s biggest polluters to hob nob, to give a platform to climate misinformation, and to use as an excuse to arrest climate protestors.
You know that cop that stopped another cop from kneeling on a protestor neck during the George Floyed protests? Yea she was fired and harassed because of that. The cop doing the strangling? He still works at the precinct.
You need to visit https://www.xenu.net/ Aka operation clam bake. The evil these guys spread to the world is insane. And their sea org is slavery.
May I enter it?
“Both? Both. both is good.”
It’s to fight and ultimately lose against entropy in a blaze of glory. All possible truths lead to this.
He seems like a cool guy. Everyone should follow him
This is a puff peice to distract. Microsoft has made no effort to lessen their carbon footprint.
I forgot where i learned this, but O’brian was put in this position on an explorer ship to hide him, and let him recover from all the murdering he did in the war.
I think it was plague of grapes about why O’brian must suffer.
Rape, will increase, rape cases…. Will probably go down.
Still with the weasel words. The word “Consistent” allows for a degree of separation between two things, saying they are alike but not the same. What they should say is “Israel’s warfare in Gaza is genocide”
Your belief in the market forces to self regulate In a way conducive to the welfare of man is flawed in its very core. In your system, meaningful choice is limited to those who can afford it, with prices set by those holding the most wealth. This exploits of all but the wealthiest individuals and shrinks the economic middle class, leaving fewer people with real financial agency.
For Anarcho-capitalism to work, corporations would need to operate counter to their natural drive for profit, avoiding any exploitation of their market power without oversight, and would ultimately lead to monopolies. Additionally, a ‘free market’ assumes impossible conditions: perfect knowledge of all products, their availability, quality, production conditions, ownership structures, environmental impacts, and entirely truthful advertising. It also assumes that consumers won’t make decisions based primarily on price. In the absence of these ideal conditions, unregulated markets don’t produce fair or beneficial outcomes for most people.
Ok… but to argue that to privatize war making to the lowest bidder sounds like the premise to a libertarian monkey paw nightmare. Like current mercenaries track record with human rights violations is…well poor would be an understatement. And what is the issue you have with NATO?
And this is what you are arguing that trump will do? Or should do? And you are aware of its full consequences?
That sounds really bad. Apologies but if this is all sarcasm, that is lost on me. I got people arguing that Trump helping Isreal finish the genocide quickly with be good for the Palestinians who live through it, and so sarcasm is long dead.
Right…i think the metaphor train has derailed here.
What possible action do you think the military could be ordered to do, that will harm its capability to wage war, and will not result in even more innocent people getting killed than the regular levels of evil? Or is this a ‘acceptable collateral damage as long as its not me’ type of thing?
The military will be effective at what ever it’ll do. You should hope it maintains some sanity at least. Like a loaded gun won’t jam just because a crazy person picked it up.
I would truly appreciate the company.
Obligatory reminder that (for iPhone at least) hitting the right side button rapidly 5 times locks out biometrics and forces pin entry