• 0 Posts
  • 278 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2024

help-circle
  • These folks have a good breakdown of RCV’s flaws. https://www.equal.vote/rcv_v_star

    A lot of it boils down to how RCV is just a series of First Past the Post elections on the same ballot. This means that it can never really rise above FPtP.

    Fun fact that the site I provided gets wrong, RCV isn’t actually 150 years old, it’s actually a bit older. The Marquis de Condorcet actually came up with the idea in the 1790s, but abandoned it because of its flaws.

    If you want some unrelated reading, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquis_de_Condorcet The guy was based as fuck.

    Here’s a direct quote from one of his more influential works, “On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship”

    The rights of men stem exclusively from the fact that they are sentient beings, capable of acquiring moral ideas and of reasoning upon them. Since women have the same qualities, they necessarily also have the same rights. Either no member of the human race has any true rights, or else they all have the same ones; and anyone who votes against the rights of another, whatever his religion, colour or sex, automatically forfeits his own.

    That was 1790.

    Sadly, the political party that was backing him fell out of power and the replacements had him arrested, and possibly killed.

    This was his final work http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1669/Condorcet_0878_EBk_v6.0.pdf


  • That is the fastest way to turn a blue state red.

    Split the vote so that the minority Republican vote can win. Because there are more registered Republicans in California than in Texas.

    No, the actual answer is to change the voting system to a Cardinal system, so that there are no such things as Spoiler party’s or split votes.

    Approval or STAR are the answer. Either would enable third parties to exist and thrive.

    As a note RCV is not a Cardinal system, and still has the Spoiler Effect. People lie about it saying it’s the fix for all problems, but it’s actually worse than what we have (there are parts that are better, but more parts that are far worse)




  • chaogomu@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBut yes.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Except, even then, an average coal plant will release more radioactive material over its lifetime than Fukushima did.

    It’s just Chernobyl that you have to top. And even then there are coal plants that come close.

    Now, it’s not apples to apples. Coal plants release uranium and thorium. Not ceasium and strontium.

    But yeah, never go swimming in a coal plant ash pit. For more than the obvious reasons.


  • chaogomu@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBut yes.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Adding more radiation to tobacco. Sure.

    But slightly serious here. The actual mechanism of about 75% of tobacco related cancer, is the fact that tobacco leaves bioaccumulate natural radioactive elements from the soil.

    If you smoke, you have radioactive lead and polonium in your lungs.






  • chaogomu@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldSheep eating
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Harris was the path of things slowly getting better. Wages finally overtaking inflation.

    Given a couple years, we would all be in a better place.

    Trump’s tariffs will drive up the price of everything. The last few years of inflation and greed will pale in comparison.








  • Technically it’s the other way around. The size of the electoral college is determined by the size of the House plus the Senate.

    Now, the House was meant to increase in size as the population increased.

    Now, since the mechanism for that increase wasn’t spelled out in the constitution, there were heated arguments every 10 years over the new maps, but it came to a head in 1921.

    Long story short, the permanent apportionment act of 1929 set the size of the House at 435 members. We’ve added two states since then, and the US population has tripped. But still it’s 435.

    Repealing that one law would fix several problems.