rahaeli on bluesky says this is fine, it’s the same ML that any T&S dept already has to apply to triage the firehose of shit, and doesn’t involve LLMs

christ this is dumb as shit

lol the nazi sees nothing wrong with LLMs of course

read the paper, they’re very stupid also

and as the paper details, they don’t do that either

why don’t you look at the paper then and find out

Correct answers are correct answers.

you should be so lucky

So long as users understand the limitations of AI

this isn’t those people

They specificallly named this one, you don’t have to make up reasons that somehow it doesn’t count.

sure is!

probably something innocuous, we should edit the quote to reflect what we think they might have meant

or glasses

yes that’s the guy does nobody remember The Nightfly

in this case it was some dickhead, but I’ve had this shit from editors too

that’s what got me: this guy was pissed off someone referenced Fagin at all, the crime of making the bozo feel uncomfortable at missing something by not reading

glasses are a fine kink! i guess those ones are a specialist taste

one of the most annoying things about writing for a US audience is they’re fucking illiterate and alluding to books confuses them

wanna grab editors by the throat and go “JUST WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU PEOPLE EVEN DOING IN HIGH SCHOOL”

actual example from today: “who the hell is Fagin never heard of him”

as you know, there is one pronatalist couple

I am delighted to hear that Veppers was literally based on Musk

ah, was that Copilot or was it Copilot? It’s MS’s favourite name right now for its bad LLM initiatlves

Pivot to AI: Amy is retiring! Probably! yes my cowriter has heard the call of revolution and will be having full and frank debates in the marketplace of ideas. WIth sweet reason.

my god