This is actually the way the law is written. Anyone who aids in any abortion, from the clinic performing it to the Uber driver taking her there – is now subject to being sued by random tattletales. The women themselves are not subject to the same thing.

They did it this way on purpose. They didn’t want the optics of the State going after these people so they specifically made it so that the State AG would not be involved in all. It would just be a bunch of private busybodies looking to get all into other people’s business.

Sigh. The man was elected President twice and people still feel compelled to tell him to watch his tone…

Looking at Reddit in particular, it’s the comments that are the most outlandish or “popular” and often having little or nothing to do with the story they’re commenting on that are risen to the top.

Reddit is infested with bots, especially on the larger subs. If things are at the top, it’s because someone paid for bots to get it there.

Except they were careful and never actually said “we will give you money to vote for Harris/against Trump”. Paying you to call him a human toilet isn’t against that law.

He did it when he won in 2016. When people pointed out that Hillary won the popular vote, he complained it was only because of the “illegals” voting.

I thought the main point of the tattletale laws was to avoid judicial review. An important part of that is to establish who has standing. If the law was enforced directly by the AG, then people could sue the office directly if they think the enforcement violated their rights. But since these laws are enforced by nosy neighbors, there is no one central body to sue to review it. They’ve essentially insulated these laws from ever having a judge rule they are invalid.

Trust me, we have tried. The problem is that while there was never a PayPal account verified to that email address, somehow a foreign number is attached to it. Every time we have tried to start an account with that email, the verification ping goes to that number, even though the email is unverified. We haven’t found a way to tell PayPal to disassociate that number, because we never had any account attached to it to begin with.

What is someone squatted on your email, starting an unverified account attached to your email address with their phone number, but the fuckers at PayPal won’t do a thing about it?

Not really, all it requires is someone to produce a signed message with one of Satoshi’s private keys, which can be easily verified with the public addresses on the blockchain. Whoever produced that message can be proven to possess that private key. Nothing short of that would be believable by the crypto nerds.

If we presume that Satoshi understood that Bitcoin may be valuable one day and kept the keys private, that would mean that the signer really is Satoshi, or one of his associates or heirs Satoshi trusted wih access. Even if that person wasn’t actually Satoshi, their word on who it is would be considered authoritative.

Unless it’s Craig. Fuck that guy. Nobody believes him.

What if I’m concerned that one of the candidates is a fraud?

You need to train it on AM talk radio first.

McDermott definitely knows why, he’s just not telling.

“I’m not in a position to go into the details on it so you can assume what you can assume,”

Maybe so, but RFK Jr’s uncle had Marilyn Monroe on his “ledger”, among others, so the infidelity is in the genes.

The AI’s ability to dodge simple questions proves it is ready to run for office.

Can you ask the chatbot if Donald Trump is guilty after letting it read the report?

You could try dressing like a drag Ivanka. He’d come chasing you with tiny groping hands.

Rudy already did that, and they recorded it. No joke.

https://youtu.be/qhtD0OtNfLQ

16 international games per year is too many. 16 neutral-site games, with some International and some at those large college stadiums, would be awesome.

Imagine Steelers-Eagles at Penn State, or Browns-Bengals at Ohio State.

What counties are they? Most EC trackers list six swing states (7 if counting NC) so it can’t be more than 2-4 per state…

Let’s put it this way. How many Independants, who were leaning toward voting for Harris already, see the Dick Cheney endorsement and say “That’s it! That’s the last straw, I’m not voting for her!” I think you can count those people on one hand (or maybe no hands). I think that group is exclusively people who would have never voted for Harris because even she is too far right for them, and are using Cheney as an excuse.

OTOH, I think many more Independants categorize themselves that way because they are fed up with partisanship entirely, and would be pulled toward the side that appears to have the bigger tent. Maybe Cheney himself isn’t the tipping point. But his endorsement, plus all the Republicans who refuse to endorse Trump, might be.

Like… an endorsement from Dick Cheney isn’t getting you independents. They hate those war criminals also.

I think you are vastly overestimating how many of these independents are progressive. I think many more of them are just too busy to care until it affects them personally. They are not as hung up on the casual war crime or two as you are, as long as they are not the ones in the receiving end of it.