Spyware free link: https://youtu.be/KGAAhzreGWw

I don’t like them putting chemicals in the water that turn the fricking frogs trans

Weep, you girls. My penis has given you up. Now it penetrates men’s behinds. Goodbye, wondrous femininity!

Amplicatus, I know that Icarus is buggering you. Salvius wrote this.

Theophilus, don’t perform oral sex on girls against the city wall like a dog

I have buggered men

Secundus likes to screw boys.

If anyone sits here, let him read this first of all: if anyone wants a screw, he should look for Attice; she costs 4 sestertii.

The one who buggers a fire burns his penis

The problem is that modlogs form a permanent record on Lemmy. Drag didn’t encourage suicide. The c/trans people don’t believe drag encouraged suicide. That issue was cleared up. But there’s still a permanent note saying drag encouraged suicide. It’s a lie. They could take back the lie by unbanning drag, and they could even ban drag again with the true reason. But the true reason is a secret, so they’re choosing to keep lying. It’s messed up.

Nazis are going to commit multiple genocides and start world war 3 if they get the chance. Choosing nonviolence against Nazis means permitting violence against everyone. Choosing violence against Nazis means preventing violence against everyone. True pacifism is active.

White girls shouldn’t have to compete against black girls for scholarships. It’s not fair. <- the same person, born 50 years earlier

Drag has seen people on this website saying that it’s wrong to advocate violence against Nazis. And drag thinks the mods and admins should remove those comments. They have no place in a free society. They do what this post is explaining, which is part of how fascism functions. Fascism requires the existence of moderates that believe violence is always wrong, so that fascism can come into being.

Clearly that man needed to be taught more about evolution when he was in school.

You have correctly understood drag’s reason for believing what drag believes. Now, drag has a hypothesis as to what rebuttal you just offered, but it’s quite bewildering, so please be patient as drag asks: Is your rebuttal of the idea of the necessity of choice, that if we believed people to be responsible for the choices they don’t make, then we would have to believe the Democrats are absolved of guilt?

Because what?

Wait… wait wait wait… okay, drag is starting to understand your point of view, drag hopes. You’re saying we can’t believe voters have any blame for the results of the election, because that would mean the Democrats can’t have any blame. Because blame is a finite resource and must be carefully rationed?

No. Blame is an infinite resource. Two people can both be 100% to blame for the same thing. The Democrats and the voters can both be bad. Drag thinks drag understands why you keep insisting drag thinks the Dems are good now. It’s because drag is blaming two different groups, and you think that’s impossible, so you assume drag is lying and actually only blaming the voters. Isn’t it?

Complaining that Biden isn’t a liberal because he’s bad is silly. Liberalism is bad. Drag wrote three paragraphs about things that actually matter, and half a sentence on a nitpick. You decided this conversation was actually going to be about drag’s nitpick. Whatever, you’re right about the nitpick, drag doesn’t care. Do you want to prove that you understand why drag made drag’s point, or do you want to take the option drag explained earlier in which you change the subject to simple material issues we both fully understand because you don’t know what drag means by “choice is inevitable”?

Oh, so we’re not actually having a discussion, we’re ignoring our opponent and throwing easy-to-understand rhetoric because it’s safe and comfortable and familiar?

You’re saying people are obligated to choose diet fascism or fascism, and those who chose are absolved of guilt while those who abstained aren’t

Fascism or liberalism, but you’ve got the spirit. We are thrust into this world with conscience and reason, and thus we are burdened with choice. You cannot crawl back into Eden and pretend you do not know of good and evil. You are imbued innately with choice and freedom, and thus responsibility. There is not an option in which you are not responsible for the consequences of your actions.

Do you understand this much of drag’s argument? The assertion that choice is inevitable? Because while your comment started out good, it immediately changed the subject into agreeing with drag about the complacency of the Democrats and the evil of Netanyahu’s regime. If you want to agree with drag all day and get nowhere on the issues we actually have reason to discuss, then continue talking about simple material things we both understand.

But if you want to show that you understand the reason drag holds drag’s opinions, then comment on the actual substance of our disagreement, the nature of choice. Can we crawl back to Eden and forsake our ability to choose? Are we responsible as passive bystanders?

If you voted for Kamala, why are you personally offended when drag criticses the non-voters? This isn’t about you, so your defensiveness isn’t needed. You can join drag in criticising the people who chose not to choose. They don’t need you defending them.

Harris and Biden are fascist. Your 11 paragraphs are attacking beliefs drag does not hold. Drag did not defend those beliefs, because drag agrees with your criticisms of them. It would be nice if your criticisms lead to a belief in protecting Palestine, but alas. You instead decide to spend all this time attacking Harris voters for not being as sour about their decision as you are. You think they, and you, have something to be guilty for. There is no guilt in choosing the least harm. There is guilt in choosing not to choose. There is guilt in neglecting one’s responsibilities in favour of the comfort of inaction.

No. Drag didn’t mention anyone who was pro-palestine at all in drag’s comment. If you’re pro-palestine and you felt targeted when drag blamed the election on people who want to blow up Palestine to teach Kamala a lesson, it might be time for some introspection.

You should probably write 11 more paragraphs on how everyone who voted against genocide is a nazi, just in case somebody didn’t read your first two screenfuls of text

How come it’s everyone’s responsibility not to vote for genocide, but you’re allowed to abstain for genocide as much as you want if you can point the finger at a politician? Like, it’s 100% Kamala’s fault you let Trump win and you therefore have zero culpability, but the voters who tried to prevent that are personally to blame for Joe Biden’s failures.

Because we already know. Voter turnout is low because Americans don’t mind having a fascist dictator. Some of them just didn’t care, and some of them thought becoming the Fourth Reich and blowing up Palestine was a decent way to teach Kamala a lesson.

They aren’t. But if one of them is, then that one person helped caused this. If ten thousand of them are, then those ten thousand people helped cause this.

This is not about finding the one person or group who bears sole responsibility and pointing the finger at them to excuse everyone else. This is about what each person has within their control, and whether they did the right thing.

When drag was growing up, all of the siblings had assigned controllers. Drag made sure of that. The little ones got to touch their own greasy filth, and drag’s was nice and clean. If drag had to touch a sibling’s controller, drag needed to wash drag’s claws or it wouldn’t feel right.