• 7 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • exe, msi, sh… It’s honestly not very difficult to get the difference between debs and other formats, and you don’t have to either. You open the app store or download a .deb from a webpage and you’re done.

    There’s bits where Linux is too fragmented, but for most distros with a good appstore setup, this flat out isn’t one of them.

    I switched recently and it took a while to be a ‘power user’ again, but the mainstream functionality works and makes sense about the same as Windows.






  • pls pull up images of real people and compare. Alternatively show to people around you who don’t engage with anime stuff and ask them to estimate.

    I get our standards are different bcs I don’t care for the artstyle (I also don’t know “the entire character’s appearance”, I see what’s in front of me), but you have to realise mine is prolly the majority viewpoint outside terminally online spaces - you can test that, do it.


  • I’m sorry, I can’t post images bcs of a bug, but I urge you to google images 9 year old, 15 year old and 20 year old women and compare them with the pic in the meme… I don’t care much for what weebs use to signify age in anime characters because that’s a standard within an industry that heavily fetishises childish characteristics in women in general. If a sexualized character looks more like a real kid than a real woman, it’s a problem.

    Also “she’s an older kid, c’mon” doesn’t help the case even a percentage point.


  • Yeah, I can see that for sure.

    I don’t like the mini version “she’s one thousand years old in the lore, she just looks like a kid” tho. I know some of you that see art like this more regularily might not see this the same because of what you’ve self normalized, but that right there is a preteen with slightly exaggarated breasts, and adding boobs to a child doesn’t make fetishization of the other features of them any more exusable. (I know you aren’t saying it is btw, it’s a general statement)



  • kay@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneI need Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    196 has always been fascinating to me, I’ve gotten barraged on the old subreddit before for being anti lolicon and a lot of dubious comments borderline defending creepy stuff get a lot of tracktion sometimes - only served to make me more aggressive on the topic which is prolly a good thing for me.

    I get we’re a bunch of kinky queers and people are thus quick to get defensive about any percieved policing of sexuality, but there are some things that make me feel like some people here have alterior motives and there’s people who haven’t really thought about ethics in relation to pornographic content that buy into the former group’s narrative a little too quickly.


  • kay@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneI need Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This could be true, but looks unlikely bcs

    1. The name of the forum - it is not petite women or whatever, it’s literally ‘fauxbait’
    2. A below comment from Doctorcrimson who seem to have gotten a very different impression than you from the same community

    Do explain how banning porn groups forms echochambers tho, never heard that one before



  • kay@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneI need Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Said women have every right to do whatever, including doing SW. This is not an individual problem.

    The problematic part is people actively searching out and forming communities around pron with women looking as close to a kid as possible. Condemning those guys has absolutely nothing to do with the people in the content and in no way shames them.

    It ain’t the women at fault, nor the content inherently, it’s the context and people fetishizing them in a way they prolly would’t be comfortable with in the first place.