Honestly it just reminds me of the moral panic over “cock ring Ken.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earring_Magic_Ken

(also amusing in this context to note that his earring is in his left ear, so I’m not sure even the homophobes were consistent about this)

No, because the map is showing how many reports they got. So it’s red where they got a lot of reports, and that correlates very tightly with where there are a lot of people, making the visualization kind of worthless.

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/heatmap_2x.png

I’m kind of reluctant to buy a headset with Google’s new VR OS on it. Cardboard was kind of fun until they cancelled it. Daydream wasn’t very good because they gave it a 2dof controller, but then they finally added 6dof head tracking–but then they cancelled the project before the headset actually came out (the one with 6dof tracking, I know the 3dof daydream headset exists, I have one. I think the 6dof one did come out [Lenovo Mirage] but the project was already dead at that point). So that was a bust. They also had project Tango for AR, but then they cancelled that right around the time an actually decent phone with support for it came out. And there was the VR180 video format, where they teamed up a bunch of hardware manufacturers, but then most of those never actually made it to market either and they dropped all the language about the project from their website. They also had that lightfield video project that allowed you to move around within a small volume, but they cancelled that project too.

Google’s attention span with VR projects just seems to average about a year, and I don’t want to shell out high-end headset money for something that might get bricked in an year.

One issue is that it can be leveraged to maintain a monopoly. Microsoft famously made a bunch of small modifications to the HTML standard, so that web sites that wanted to work with MS Internet Explorer had to write custom versions to be compatible. But because so many people just used IE because it was bundled with Windows, those “extensions” started to become their own standard, so that then other browsers had to adopt MS’s idiosyncrasies in order to be compatible with the sites, which in turn harmed standardization itself. They even had a term for this technique: “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.” It nearly worked for them until Google pushed them out with Chrome. Microsoft tried to do the same thing again with Java until the government got involved.

It’s complicated, certainly, but there are legitimate cases where “just a little tweak” can be quite a big problem for a standard.

Oh, cool! I didn’t know about that. I might actually check it out once that’s released.