• 0 Posts
  • 339 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 1st, 2024

help-circle




  • 99% of authors or commentators or journos writing about climate change need a 1-tonne solid carbon periodic table smashed over their head.

    Everyone in UK would be taught pythagoras, periodic table, evolution at secondary school. Some learning disabled or who DGAF might skip over it or won’t actually learn it; but it’d be at taught in basic terms on the general syllabus for most people before age 16. Certainly anyone specialising in science / maths at 16-18 would be expected to know this stuff at a reasonable level from secondary school.

    Having had to choose only 3 subjects at age 16, it’s very limiting for young people who don’t really know what they are doing. You drop one thing and it rules out a whole swathe of things you might never have known would be useful. I sort of wish i’d been forced to do chemistry longer, I dropped it because it was boring and I was allowed to choose stupid shit that proved FAR more useless (Economics).

    I’d have probably ended up doing something more interesting and maybe even useful with my life - though maybe the grass is always greener.








  • oo1@lemmings.worldtoUnpopular Opinion@lemmy.worldxxx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    -1 not unopular.

    But it’s not the worst form of noise pollution; unneccesary motor vehicles, and phones on public transport are worse.

    Measure the noise level outside the edge of their property, if it is lower than a car driving by, it’s hard to complain too much. If it’s directed off their property directly onto a public street then yes.