I’m actually okay with semi-centralized. Most people need that to trust a platform, but it still gives you the option to self host if you really care.
I’m actually okay with semi-centralized. Most people need that to trust a platform, but it still gives you the option to self host if you really care.
It’s to be expected. My theory is that millennials grew up late enough that they had access to the early Internet, so they got exposed to all kinds of strange cultures and had to learn tolerance and acceptance.
The younger generations grew up with an internet dominated by mega corporations, and algorithmic feeds. Unfortunately hostile states and other bad actors have been very effective at exploiting these mechanisms, causing a strong right wing shift simply due to exposure.
Your brain is strongly colored by what it consumes, of course.
Of course! It’s not like animals have jet engines!
Human brains are merely the proof that such energy efficiencies are possible for intelligence. It’s likely we can match or go far beyond that, probably not by emulating biology directly. (Though we certainly may use it as inspiration while we figure out the underlying principles.)
So they took funding from a crypto capital fund, but with the expectation that blockchain would never be added to the product. Seems fairly okay to me.
As always, technology doesn’t change human behaviors, it just speeds them up.
Heck, Obi Wan should’ve known more about Leia than Yoda. Maybe Yoda DID mean Ahsoka…
You should research the definition of AI then. Even the A* pathfinding algorithm was historically considered AI. It’s a remarkably broad field.
Even Zuckerberg admits that trying to scale LLMs larger doesn’t work because the energy and compute requirements go up exponentially. There must exist a different architecture that is more efficient, since the meat computers in our skulls are hella efficient in comparison.
Once we figure that architecture out though, it’s very likely we will be able to surpass biological efficiency like we have in many industries.
Right, so AIs don’t really know what words are. All they see are tokens. The tokens could be words and letters, but they could also be image/video features, audio waveforms, or anything else.
I wish I had your optimism
Right, cost effective should not be construed to be good.
Do NOT lick the airlock
Elon almost certainly earned votes for Trump by
Or anything freeze dried!
Arguably a bullet in nearly any human is the most cost effective solution per ton of CO2.
And because they often are included in food products, and there’s a fair amount of regulation around mixing non-food with food.
It’s uncomfortable to admit, but unless there’s a way to profit off of saving the world, very few people will actually do it. I wish it wasn’t the case but it is.
When renewable energy became cheaper than fossil fuels, it caused a complete upheaval of our strategy almost overnight.
When electric cars became similarly priced to ICE cars, they started taking over the market.
When meat alternatives become cheaper than real meat, we’ll see something similar happen to the ranching industry.
I mean, it’s still a profit motive. But a profit motive that also helps the world.
Yikes, that is wildly irresponsible
“Natural” women implies the existence of unnatural, eldritch women, who drive men mad through their ancient Lovecraftian presence.