I was worried about that with Arch, and yes the setup takes longer, but other than that for me it’s just been “run ‘pacman -Syu’ every few weeks” and otherwise forget, been running like that for a few years. So I’d still say it’s set and forget tbh, just that the set part is a bit more work.
It’s not hard, just if you’re doing it for a struct with a lot of fields it’s a lot of boilerplate
Oh, yah, in that case sure
Did we read the same article? The opinion of the author is that there isn’t enough demand to buy the current production
It is a bad thing (for the company) if nobody’s buying them…
I don’t really like Go either, but it’s better than Java, and it’s pretty good for Big Software ™. In the end, every language has some problems. Java just has all of them.
That’s not true, otherwise distillation would be impossible. You lose some water along with the alcohol but not the same percentage of both.
More likely it was “please cite these tangentially related papers from the same field but not actually related to this work, which were totally not written by me, your anonymous reviewer, (who was picked because of my activity in this research area), and I’m definitely not suggesting them to drive my citation count up, no siree.”
It’s not rational, it’s virtue signalling for the owning class. It’s saying “we are pious believers in the neoliberal order and we are happy to treat our employees like shit”.
Until they eventually do
He’ll be a grovelling serf, and probably not end up in the actual firing line
deleted by creator
People say her podcast is actually good. I don’t know, I haven’t listened to it, but if so, then she is playing the game with decidedly more skill than just one 5-second video clip.
Holy racist Freud lol
Camelcase in python, ew, a fundamentalist would do that
And the appetite for change is so great that even those minor details are enough for people, but this campaign couldn’t even do that.
No it’s not, it’s a great policy, it just needs to be supplemented by incentives to build or direct government building programs.
A populist won the election, yes, and that’s much more relevant than left or right.
The solution is absolutely for the democrats to move left, but not because it’s left, because people want to hear things about how their lives are going to improve.
Instead of blathering about an “opportunity economy” and more fuel for the war machine, they should be talking about higher wages, cheaper healthcare, cheaper housing, and cheaper eggs.
People who want to vote for the right wing already have a party to vote for, they’re not going to switch. This strategy just alienates people whose lives suck.
Even if the tool works perfectly, you have to run it every time you change something. It’s not the end of the world, but it’s still much nicer to just have a macro to derive it at compile time.