Yes, the syntax is the same. It also support various GNU and BSD extensions.
My email: [email protected]
Yes, the syntax is the same. It also support various GNU and BSD extensions.
GNU bc is unmaintained for years. The latest version is from 2017. It don’t have a repo or a mailing list.
bc-gh started in 2018 and it is still actively developed. It is adopted by many projects I’ve listed in my post.
perhaps they don’t care about bc. I think they don’t even notice that GNU bc haven’t been updated since 2017.
I will change it to “licensing reason”. Thank you
But the software you listed are used by many peoples. bc-gh is robust and performant, GNU bc is not actively developed, and benchmark shows that it is clearly slower than bc-gh in most case. But in most distros bc-gh is not available.
But there are technical reason too. IIRC, gcc > 4.3 drop support for some architecture?
~/real
~/real/cprac
~/real/git
Making a LFS distro already show you all the GNU mess! Why another distro?
GitHub can you shut down this repo? ahaha 🤣 🤣 🤪
its quality will not be lower than usa linux, as they will pull latest development but not push back (to the linux list)
The Linux world have bad things, especially in userland and libc
op-ti-mize [verb (trans.)]* … (gcc) to modify executable code so that it fails more quickly.
Wow. Hope that they will do better than kspp
~/bin is the real directory for UNIX.
Compile it, install it to your ~/bin.
Ahaha! It is already bad!
Wow. Understanding GNU’s man page?
BSD developers: who cares about that. And, it is already happen. Android libc use lots of code of OpenBSD libc. OpenSSH is used everywhere.
GNU’s ssh implementation seems to be some abandoned trash, even though it was started in 1998, before OpenSSH. If OpenSSH doesnt exist, we can hope that everyone will be using differently broken ssh implementations; I’d expect gnu ssh to be a buggy, unreliable implementation which support hundreds of thounsands of flags and configuration options. Workers everywhere will be punished because of their buggy implementation of ssh. Why workers in every companies have to make their own ssh implementation? They should be doing something else.
OpenBSD is the easiest to use.
There are errors in my post, so it must not be chatgpt ;)