• 15 Posts
  • 491 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 10th, 2023

help-circle







  • Industrial scale power requires massive destruction of nature. That’s the nature of trying to light and heat millions of homes, especially in the winter. The question must become what is the least harmful most effective thing to do. It isn’t as simple as “solar farms and wind farms” since you have to heat and light those homes when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. “Batteries!” Sure but the environmental devastation from having to build battery banks that large would be overwhelming, not to mention having to size your solar and wind to provide all the province’s power while the sun shines and wind blows meaning there’d be way more than you expect, and then after 30 years you’d have to do it all over again because the batteries, windmills, and solar panels would all have to be replaced.

    Water looks nice when it’s at a scale that can’t power anything too. In fact, even small enough scale fossil fuels don’t look that bad. The problem is when you make it big enough to actually provide all the energy you need. One big reason why “reduce” is the most important thing we can do.










  • I tend to think that right now we’re in an era of Soviet-style hyperrealism because things are actually getting much worse for the common man in many ways, and nobody wants to be the one holding the bag and having to tell people that things actually are as bad as they feel.

    I’ve seen quite a few politicians say it outright: “Don’t tell people things are bad, they’ll start acting like things are bad which will only make things worse” – sort of like George W. Bush’s stupid “The economy is crashing, keep spending no matter what” directions to the people. It’s really irresponsible, and one of the reasons why both the people and the state have gotten so much weaker over the past 20 years (They’re expressing more authority but the clock is ticking). Instead of pulling back which hurts the economy in the moment but helps individuals be more resilient and prepared, and instead of pulling back spending when times are allegedly “good” so you spend in the bad times and you spend in the good times, both parties shotgun money into the economy during the “good” times and then also during the “bad” times.

    Bread and circuses, and the fall of an empire… Much like 1991 I’m sure.