No gods, no masters.
For context on the reference: https://www.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/1but3c2/wait_zoomers_actually_cant_read_analogue_clocks_i/
Because I personally don’t want to eat 80 grapes. Besides the sugar content of 80 grapes is not healthy.
That’s just wrong, sorry. Demonizing fruits is one of the most dangerous “health trends” on the face of the planet. Right up there with antivaxxers.
And, again you can eat leaves which don’t have sugar and have lots of other great nutrients and fiber, while having less water volume.
No one is forcing you to drink it.
You just haven’t encountered that kind of peer pressure yet.
There’s nothing wrong with polarization. Some things are clear cut enough to remain clear cut.
Let me put it differently, how much poop do you want in your drinking water?
Both. Often the point of prosecution is to “make an example of -”, which is just a dry and long-winded way of shaming them.
Removed by mod
It’s usually not the caffeine, but it is difficult to untangle the factors. Decaf should count more or less the same as normal.
It’s not. Just eat the grapes or grape leaves. Stop trying to make the J curve happen, there is no safe minimum dose of alcohol.
why do you hate Zoomers?
I hope that young people learn from this.
In a pinch, if you don’t have Word, try WordPad.
And a coal comeback. And a revival of abandoned oil wells. In fact, there are projects *for the use small nuclear reactors to power more fracking. It’s all very stupid.
Great article! It gets more depressing with every paragraph, so it’s realistic.
You implant a chip in your brain that gives it control over your finger movement.
Fourth try: total motion blur
Trust the muscle memory.
Put this in the sidebar (it can hold images just like comments and posts)
The spirit of Onion.
race to the bottom or arms race conditions.
Whoever is allowing this is ensuring that the whole thing will end terribly.
Removed by mod
You’re reading the Climate Forward newsletter, for Times subscribers only. News and insights for a warming world. Get it with a Times subscription.
Ah, so that’s why it’s not a free and accessible article. This kind of article is tucked away.
All you have to do to understand this problem is to think about all the jobs in coal, oil, gas, plastics, slaughter houses, meat processing, and car manufacturing. And all the pensions.
In general, fossil jobs need to go. We can’t get around this fact.
Leftists need to dig deep into history and realize that socialism existed before fossil industry. While abundance sounds great, there is no abundance of means and places to put atmospheric carbon in (sinks). Many carbon sinks are burning and defrosting as we speak.
Fortunately, leftism has a long tradition of managing scarcity. That’s missing from these parties. Example:
Seize the Means of Carbon Removal: The Political Economy of Direct Air Capture , by Andreas Malm and Wim Carton.
And a discussion on YouTube: The Imperial Mode of Living - Ulrich Brand & Markus Wissen, comments by Lucas Poy
Bonus meme: