The height of the drive cage is wider than the case. Its a surprisingly compact case

I wish I had a solution. But its the same with all shitty titles, you have to hope people click and read the article/comments in order to get the nuanced information.

This post title is pretty bad. Even the news article says “Scientists use AI [read: machine learning] to [come up with new battery idea]”.

I did that for a while but some features were limited and also required internet. It was also slower in general.

Improvement to Libre Impress or an alternative that is better. PowerPoint is one of the only things keeping windows around for me.

Mine are also literary. They are references to Sanderson’s cosmere series and the names chosen reflect their purpose.

I have an old optiplex SFF which is called Preservation because it has a disk drive for ripping media, it’s a disk wiping station for repurposing drives, and it’s old hardware I’m preserving.

Agreed. Everyone should learn to seek out multiple reviews while searching for products and not trust one source.

Love channels like Jeff geerling and craft computing for homelab stuff. They manage to keep things short from, fun, and informative. GN and Explaining Computers is too long form and dry for me. Nothing I’m doing is that deep. But they are super necessary for the space and I recognize that.

I would never follow what they do in server videos exactly, but I learned a ton from their server video backlog. Also find their server shenanigans very fun. Think server and the occasional actually useful tech tip video are still their best stuff.

Most else feels half baked or falls into the GN video criticism.

Another comparable thing is the retro emulator boxes where they play a couple games and go: “Well, it played games, it’s either fine or terrible. now check out out sponsor!!”

I still really like their server content and the home pool water cooling has been a recent cool series.

A lot of these comments are missing a large point which is that, if the claim is true, the books are being pirated and then effectively used for a commercial application.

So the authors are losing money through this process and did not give their permission for their work to be used in a commercial way.

The decision of this case will be wildly important for the development of AI.