Drag was banned from [email protected] a day ago. As you can see, no comments or posts were removed alongside the ban:

In fact, drag has never commented or posted in the community:

Drag has no history of transphobia and no history of trolling. And drag can unequivocably prove that drag was never transphobic or trollish on Ten Forward, because drag has never said anything there. This is a ban for literally, provably, nothing.

  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    you misgendered his daughter

    Drag has already addressed that false claim in this thread, and drag also brought clear and unambiguous receipts.

    In addition you’ve been referring to other people using your own drag pronoun, (probably as a substitute for you/your/you’re) which for people who do not use your pronoun is indeed misgendering.

    This hasn’t happened. Drag is very curious to see which comments you think have been doing that, because drag would like to understand how your mind works. It’s very unlike anybody drag has ever spoken with before. Drag would be happy to clarify any cases where you’re confused.

    Honestly I know the ethics of preemptive bans are questionable at best

    You also gave drag bans to four communities you moderate, which drag has never visited and didn’t even know existed. Calling that “pre-emptive” is somewhat misleading, in drag’s opinion. The only effect the ban has is to pollute the modlog. It’s not “pre-emptive”, it’s a vehicle for spreading propaganda about people you don’t like. It’s harassment. Source: https://lemmy.nz/post/16152672

    Please do not approach drag again. Drag wants to resolve the problem you’ve caused in the pawb.social modlog, and never see you again. Drag is not interested in pursuing your friendship.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Go try and post to those communities or vote in them, do you think that bans for communities you don’t participate in mean nothing. Of course they don’t. They deny you access to them. Their description is meant to highlight the reason they occurred, would you prefer future bans have an empty message? I don’t think that will change anything you’ll still harass and sealion me for you being banned from all future use of a community, and not being able to prevent it.

      Now if you are worried about what people think of you based on your modlog incursions you should be worried about the real issues, like you saying that trans people should buy a gun and take out a red hat before doing themselves. That’s an utterly atrocious and disgusting thing to say in a trans friendly community, and since it came from you directly, it’s way worse than anything I or anyone else could’ve put in the ban reason.

      The feeling is very much mutual dragonfucker. I don’t comment on these posts because I want to be your friend or tell you something. I do it because it is public and provides context and information for others, whether you respond or not doesn’t make much of a difference to me. Your responses do provide more clarity though that none of this behavior from you is at all good faith.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Go try and post to those communities or vote in them

        Drag doesn’t want to. Drag never wanted to. The point was always to put what you wanted to say in the modlog. If it weren’t for the modlog’s visibility, the ban would mean nothing, because drag doesn’t want to use those communities. You knew drag wasn’t a user of those communities, you knew all this.

        you saying that trans people should buy a gun and take out a red hat before doing themselves

        Don’t misrepresent what was said. If you’re going to use drag’s comments as evidence, use them. The actual text drag wrote. The text which indicates that drag was not advocating suicide. No lies, please.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Drag doesn’t want to. Drag never wanted to. The point was always to put what you wanted to say in the modlog. If it weren’t for the modlog’s visibility, the ban would mean nothing, because drag doesn’t want to use those communities. You knew drag wasn’t a user of those communities, you knew all this.

          Nope but believe what you wanted to believe. Modlog reasons are good moderator etiquette and you would complain to me if I wrote anything else including nothing at all, because the problem was never that I wrote anything, it’s that I hurt your pride and instilled a new fear that you could become banned from places without posting or commenting in them.

          Don’t misrepresent what was said. If you’re going to use drag’s comments as evidence, use them. The actual text drag wrote. The text which indicates that drag was not advocating suicide. No lies, please.

          Nice try, but suggesting suicide when you know that people are suicidal is the same as encouraging them. Feel free to disagree but that’s not just my opinion, it’s well agreed upon consensus that you don’t give people who may be thinking of killing themselves ideas on the method.

          It’s also well known that you do not ever encourage people to murder others, this is what would be considered illegal or dangerous speech because you encouraged others to cause real world harm. Saying you didn’t mean it afterwards doesn’t negate it. Maybe some might buy it but I’m not and the mods clearly aren’t.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Drag didn’t suggest suicide either.

            It’s also well known that you do not ever encourage people to murder others, this is what would be considered illegal or dangerous speech because you encouraged others to cause real world harm.

            No, that’s not true. Every man, woman, and enby (most likely closeted) who went to the front lines of WWII and shot a Nazi dead is a hero. Shooting soldiers of Nazi Germany is an unequivocable good. Drag is proud of all the nazi killers who fought in the war, and who worked in logistics and support roles. Drag is proud of all the workers at home who kept the nazi-killing war machine going, too. Praising nazi killers isn’t illegal. It sure is dangerous, though. To nazis. To normal, non-fascist people; to queer people and people of colour; it decreases danger.