NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoHistorically accuratelemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up112arrow-down11
arrow-up111arrow-down1imageHistorically accuratelemmy.worldNonCredibleDefense@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareFushuan [he/him]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThey could have dropped the bombs on the coast or a non populated area as a warning, and act if they didn’t surrender though. That’s a demonstration, dropping it in a city/town was not, that was a masacre.
minus-squarereeen@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThey dropped the first one on a city and that didn’t get the point across, what would bombing a beach do?
minus-squaresci@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agothe plan was always to drop at least 2, to show it was not a one-off trick.
They could have dropped the bombs on the coast or a non populated area as a warning, and act if they didn’t surrender though. That’s a demonstration, dropping it in a city/town was not, that was a masacre.
They dropped the first one on a city and that didn’t get the point across, what would bombing a beach do?
the plan was always to drop at least 2, to show it was not a one-off trick.