• PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you’re making selections based on diversity, you’re fundamentally not focusing on hiring the best of the best.

    Are there no women and people of color in the best of the best?

    I mean, get what you’re trying to say, but you’re making unwarranted assumptions about the demographics of the cream of the crop. So, I’m trying to get you to either realize you’re doing that and retract basically everything you’ve said so far, or to keep exploring what you think the best look like and why DEI is antithetical to picking people those meritorious looking people.

    • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      The best is the best, regardless of whatever bs diversity qualities. You’ll get them without having to specifically look for shit like race and sex. Looking for those instead means you’re no longer looking for the best, you’re looking for whoever meets minimum standards and is also an acceptable race

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        If demographics don’t matter, then what exactly is wrong with preferring someone of an acceptable race in the best of the best? (You still haven’t said whether there are women and people of color in the best of the best or not…so let’s assume there are.)

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          preferring someone of an acceptable race in the best of the best

          All races are acceptable. You do know race is just a social construct right?

        • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because the moment you’re preferring race, you’re fundamentally not preferring something else, and if you ask me, race is pretty much the absolute bottom of the list of things to judge people on.

          • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I said, let’s assume that the best of the best is diverse in demographics.

            You’re saying that race preferences necessarily exclude other preferences. But what is not being excluded is whether any given person is the best of the best by our assumption.

            So, sure, race can be the absolute bottom of the list of things to judge people on, but that’s inconsequential. We’re still highly qualified candidates.

            It seems like I’m missing something: what other preferences should take precedence over race, then? We’re already at the top of the top, the most whipped of the whipped cream. What other preferences might you prefer to take precedence over race at this level?

            Or are you saying something else entirely?

            • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              But what is not being excluded is whether any given person is the best of the best by our assumption.

              I mean if you want to work from a false premise, there’s no point in further having this discussion

              • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I literally asked you to correct me.

                there’s no point in further having this discussion

                That’s where I’m at, too. Thx for the argument.

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I literally asked you to correct me.

                  I did. Multiple fucking times. But it didn’t fit whatever stupid strawman you wanted, so you just ignored it and acted stupid. Or more realistically, it wasn’t an act

                  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You’ve my permission to have the last word after this:

                    None of you that I’ve argued with so far have any idea what you’re saying.

                    I can’t press you on anything because, as far as I can tell, your beliefs are completely (or mostly, in Winter’s case) divorced from reality and logic. I mean, you consider thought experiments as strawmen, for god’s sake! Your “corrections” fail to correct me when I’m trying to be corrected. You make the same logical mistakes over and over and over with nary a hint of awareness. You’re all unable to consider alternatives that might lead to the same consequences, and you can’t see that you can’t either.

                    Nonetheless, it was a good argument. So, again, thanks. But I definitely won’t be doing this again with y’all.