• TheChurn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war

    Did you miss the part where the first such event didn’t take place until after the invasion by the North?

      • TheChurn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The comment I replied to said this:

        This was the instigating event behind the civil war.

        Dictionary.com says this for the word “instigating”

        Causing, initiating, responsible for

        Please explain how an event that occured after the invasion was the cause or initiator of the war.

        If you cannot, then admit you didn’t read the thread and just came in here to muddy the waters.

        If you are too proud to admit that, just ghost.

        • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t claim they were correct. If you look above, I made a weaker claim than they did.

          that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war