• xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    The wording says “third-parties as a service”, so as long as Redis isn’t accessible by people outside your organization, it’s fine. But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

    • rbits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      But paid Redis hosting wouldn’t be allowed on the new license.

      Where does it say this? I can’t see that in the SSPL

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s in the RSALv2:

        You may not make the functionality of the Software or a Modified version available to third parties as a service

        • rbits@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Ah right. You could do a paid Redis service if you use the SSPL license though, right?

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            That does seem to be the case. As long as any modifications to the source are publicly available. Which is pretty reasonable.