The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoI now know why you crylemmy.worldimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1896arrow-down116
arrow-up1880arrow-down1imageI now know why you crylemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareLiz@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44·1 year agoDid a robot kill a worker, or did someone improperly bypass a safety system and get themselves killed? If it has the name “robot” the human interactions should be limited and strictly defined.
minus-squareDeceptichum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·edit-21 year agoRobots don’t kill people, people kill people. Also you forgot the more likely scenario of, someone in charge made someone below them do something unsafe and got them killed.
minus-squareNegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoGotta cut those corners to maximize value for the shareholders! Employee death is just the cost of doing business.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThat’s just my 136-axis electrical hammer, officer!
Did a robot kill a worker, or did someone improperly bypass a safety system and get themselves killed? If it has the name “robot” the human interactions should be limited and strictly defined.
Robots don’t kill people, people kill people.
Also you forgot the more likely scenario of, someone in charge made someone below them do something unsafe and got them killed.
Gotta cut those corners to maximize value for the shareholders! Employee death is just the cost of doing business.
That’s just my 136-axis electrical hammer, officer!