You can debate the need to arrest, but creating a ruse that ends up with the man being shot several times?

  • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tells a justification story

    So cops can just roll up in plain clothes, not announce themselves, start assaulting people and when those people try to defend themsleves, the cops can just shoot them for “self-defense”?

    • mob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know the full story, but I’m also not filling in blanks with my imagination.

      With the information we have, this story could easily go either way.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Says you, filling in the blanks, under the assumption that someone would pull a gun on someone who states they’re law enforcement? Two edged sword, friend.

        • mob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article states that the guy pointed a gun at the officers.

          Even without them being officers, I am pretty sure pointing a gun at someone gives them the right to defend themselves. If not legal, at least moral.

          Now what caused the events to take place could change the whole scenario either way. For all we know, the police confronted the brother for ritually sacrificing kittens to a Republican god or something, or the police were smuggling children and the brother was a witness.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Funny how people would argue on one side that pointing a gun at someone is perfectly legit self defense, but if it’s a cop that the individual says didn’t state they were a cop, suddenly it’s cool to arrest them.

            Really trying hard to play both sides of coin to be right, aren’t ya.

            • mob@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Pointing a gun at someone is not self defense. It’s intent to kill.

              And I’m not playing both sides, I’m just not jumping to conclusions off a vague article

              • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The gymnastics are incredible. If pointing a gun isn’t self defense then there would be a lot of gun/parts manufacturers out of business as an enormous amount of arsenals would suddenly vanish when people were no longer able to justify owning most of their guns.

                Are you for real? What are you gonna Butwhatabout me next over? Keep moving the goalposts.

                • mob@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Eh, it always ends up with cliche copy/paste comments about whatabout/goalposts/mental gymnastics.

                  I guess y’all know how it all went down and can condemn the guilty party without any doubt.