• Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      23 days ago

      I could see Apple buying it. The form factor makes sense, it’s the fact that it relies on AI and has its own cell connection are the main issues. If I could tap it and have Siri take dictation or take a picture of something to get more information it would be pretty neat.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Why on earth would apple buy this shitty android device? And feature wise, they can just make the airpods into an AI device paired with your phone or watch.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        22 days ago

        I don’t need any hardware that does something my phone already does.

        I don’t understand this reverse consolidation these companies think people want.

      • efstajas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 days ago

        Does it though? Having it pull down your shirt, having to rely on projecting a GUI on your hand, and being unable to hear it in loud environments all seem like pretty strong limitations of the form factor

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          23 days ago

          I’d drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin.

          Apple’s got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you’ve got the phone so you can use the headphones.

          • farcaller@fstab.sh
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            23 days ago

            If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There’s no point in such a device at all, then.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              23 days ago

              Airpods don’t have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain.

              And I don’t have Airpods because I’d lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones.

              • efstajas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                23 days ago

                If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It’s not a technical problem, it’s just a stupid idea, it’s not an ergonomic place to use a camera.

                  • stonehopper@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    22 days ago

                    Bruh i’d worried about the privacy of your kids when wearing crappy cheap device with a camera on it

                  • efstajas@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    20 days ago

                    For sure, my point is just that they could if it made sense — so clearly they don’t think it does, at least for now.

                • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store

                  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    22 days ago

                    Sunglasses are very easy to lose.

                    I’m considering a prescription pair because those are less likely to be lost.

                    I just wish they weren’t meta linked.