• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Your proof that I hate the guy is ina comment where I said he wasn’t involved? I know logic is difficult for you but you can do better.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The question mark at the end of a sentence is an indication that a question was asked. Was that too difficult of a question for you to answer?

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            It wasn’t a difficult question

            Then you would have answered it.

            it just showed how little you understood my argument.

            Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.

            Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I said that’s the only logical reason to engage in anything about Hunter Biden in a Conservative community.

                We’ve all ready established your logic and reasoning skills are below average. This is just another exampme.

                For someone who doesn’t care about Joe you’re doing an awful lot of caring about your perception of caring about Joe.

                It’s just fun to prove you wrong and watch you try to weasel your way out.

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    1st you asked for sources supporting my original reply. I provided the article which had the emails from Hunters laptop.

                    Then you claimed the emails were not real, I provided the transcript of Hunter stating they were real.

                    Then you claimed I was impuning Joe. I provided my original comment which showed I was not.

                    Now you’re claiming the emails are not important to you but you keep replying.

                    Where are you going to slither to next?