Capitalism’s ability to provide moral and ideological cover for the self-commodification of every aspect of humanity is incredible. 100 years ago you’d have to force women to do this, today some are not just willing to do it, but see it as a noble cause and contribution for the war machine of empire.
I love how of all the things she could do to provide support for an army, she skipped over cooking and first aid and her brain went straight to being a prostitute
The absolute effect of liberalism on women’s perception of themselves and their role in the world
This entire thread smacks of weirdly sexist brainworms to me
I’m not even talking about this because I’m believe in that “feminism is only about individual choice!” bs, but because it’s weird to imply that wanting to be a prostitute instead of a medic or a cook is some kind of mental degradation, and all three of those things being assumed as the only roles a woman would play in a war is just gross
but because it’s weird to imply that wanting to be a prostitute instead of a medic or a cook is some kind of mental degradation
…Is it? I do not think it is a stretch to say that the despersonalization of a human being into a sexual object is indeed pretty degrading.
and all three of those things being assumed as the only roles a woman would play in a war is just gross
Helping the wounded and the starved are the main tasks that volunteering organizations play in any warzone, be it either men or women. It is the kind of thing one volunteers for unless they are in the very small minority of people who are either dense enough or who have enough of a death wish to go there to fight and get blown up by an Iskander missile (RIP Reddit battalion).
…Is it? I do not think it is a stretch to say that the despersonalization of a human being into a sexual object is indeed pretty degrading.
I mean, yeah, wanting to have sex is a pretty normal desire for a lot of people, so it’s not a surprise that some people would choose to do so professionally. There are definitely systemic issues at play that coerce people into becoming prostitutes, which makes the industry very bad altogether, but if removed from that context it’s pretty reasonable (and neither of the comments in the chain really seemed to have been complaining about the context)
but if removed from that context it’s pretty reasonable
Good grief. I am sorry, but that stances like this one come from the mouths of comrades is the reason why I always object when a communism study guide for beginners does not include texts from Alexandra Kollontai.
Sex under coercion is rape. Work under the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie is done by proletarians under economic coercion as they have to work to be able to fulfill their basic needs. Therefore, sex as a means of living, or in other words, prostitution, is rape.
You have four options at this point: you can either accept this fact and move on; you can deny that work under a bourgeois dictatorship functions by placing working class people under economic coercion, a point at which you should consider why call yourself a communist anymore; or you could either deny that sex under coercion is rape or, heavens forbid it, that rape is acceptable under any economic system, both actions that would get yourself immediately kicked from any minimally respectable communist party. The choice is yours.
I mean… that’s why I said “removed from context”. All of this is context, context that was missing from previous comments (which read more like “how dare this woman not be traditional” to me). I agree that prostitution is coercive and wrong in every current implementation.
Make no mistake, this is to normalise comfort women, to make it seem like women want to be in this position. She’s a loud and proud “volunteer” so they can dismiss the voices of those forced into this. This is probably damage control for some impending sexual abuse scandal in Ukraine’s military. Muddying the waters before it actually comes to light.
Who was forced into it? Well, other than people raped by the invaders, but I suspect you’re not talking about those
What is human trafficking for 200, Alex?
According to conservatives of any colors it’s every time a woman does anything other than being a mother of 7 in a monogamous patriarchical relationships. Especially if she works as any type of sex worker.
That isn’t to say that sex work isn’t ripe with problems with realyl occurring sex trafficking and otger problems like women being forced to participate due to the capitalist hell they are living in, but for some reason we are having this conversation under the post of a woman doing it on her owh will, so there is that.
But all of it doesn’t realy matter I guess because I suspect the real reason for this post is to simp for putin by justifying his aggression with the usual “Ukraine bad because women are showing tits to people for money”
This will definitely turn the tide of the war 🤯
Putin in tears, pissing and shitting in the corner as we speak.
Comfort women are ok when the Nazis do it apparently
Libs have always supported sex work so long as you claim it’s empowering to the women.
do you wanna see even crazier shit https://twitter.com/modeltechie/status/1646952255436869633?s=20
she is complaining about ukrainian men not putting out lmao
damn this is actually sad. she needs some self-respect
Influencer and OnlyFans model Fan-Pei Koung is helping the Ukrainian wartime efforts with “free emotional breastfeeding to soldiers and volunteers
I saw the new york post article on this on Hexbear yesterday, this was the preview tagline for the article, almost turned me into a Posadist on the spot
You realized humanity’s undeniable spiritual connection with dolphins?/j
Nukes. Humanity’s undeniable spiritual connection with nukes ☢️ 🐬 ☢️
I hate Ukraine more now knowing that they have soldiers in their military that would be okay with the idea of that and want it (shudders)
If it makes you feel better none of the soldiers have actually used this “service” yet, from what people on Hexbear were saying
Hopefully that is true
