Deceptichum@quokk.au to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 days agoguess I'll just play with my nutsquokk.auimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down128
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageguess I'll just play with my nutsquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 days agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·28 days agoI assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-228 days agothat’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·28 days agoobligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down7·28 days agoLegos is grammatically correct.
minus-squaregedaliyah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·28 days agoNo, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·28 days agono, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·28 days agoWhich should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·28 days agono, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-228 days agoGreat, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·28 days agoyes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·28 days agoSo what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn’t change the fact they are speaking about grammar.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-227 days agono they aren’t. they’re talking about a trademark.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·27 days agoYes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.
I assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
that’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
obligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
Legos is grammatically correct.
No, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
no, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
Which should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
no, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
Great, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
yes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
So what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn’t change the fact they are speaking about grammar.
no they aren’t. they’re talking about a trademark.
Yes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.