- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
I must say, the Billet Labs part nailed me to the floor.
For someone who has to do with prototypes and early development products, such a blunder would have cost me my current job and would have barred me from any other in my field
The Billet Labs cooler block stuff actually made me go “what the fuck” and got me to unsubscribe. That’s not just some error you can cut out or some funny joke, everything about that was something that Billet Labs could likely prove monetary damages for in the worst case scenario.
Fwiw, Linus made a post today and said they’ve already arranged to compensate billet for the prototype.
Fwiw, Linus made a post today and said they’ve already arranged to compensate billet for the prototype.
That has very strong “I’m sorry that I got caught” energy.
And how will they compensate for the lost work, as GN pointed out? Didn’t Billit Labs say they were unable to continue working on the product, since the prototype wasn’t available?
Except that’s also a lie, because as the new GN video talking about that response points out, Linus only contacted Billet about it after the GN video was posted, and they absolutely had not “arranged to compensate Billet for the prototype” yet
Yeah, everything else was bad, but I think ultimately forgivable if they can tighten up their testing and QA process going forward. The Billet Labs thing is on a whole other level though. Like, how do you even fuck up that bad as a professional organization?
Do you think LTT can invest in one laptop company and still review theirs and others’ laptops? I don’t know the right answer - I’m interested in your perspective.
Hard to say. Linus has always made it sound like his investment in Framework is a personal one, not one made by LMG. If that’s the case, then I think any potential issues could be largely sidestepped by just having someone else do all the laptop reviews.
If that’s not the case and LMG is directly involved with Framework, then it gets a bit tricky. To their credit, they’ve done a good job of disclosing the Framework investment whenever the company is brought up, but I don’t watch most of LTT’s review content, so I’m not sure if it’s being mentioned in the context of other laptop reviews. If not, it needs to be.
The whole point of having that kind of disclosure though is so people know that the information being presented is potentially biased. At a certain point, it’s on the audience to take that bias into account and cross reference other sources before making any purchasing decisions. I’m not sure there’s anything LMG can really do to alleviate the perceived conflict of interest, unless they just stop reviewing laptops altogether. Whether or not it’s ethical to continue reviewing laptops in that context, even with a full disclosure, is a question I don’t have a good answer to.If Linus and his wife own 100% (or nearly 100%) of LMG, does it matter who invested in Framework? Especially when he has so much creative control?
As far as I remember, they do not disclose the Framework investment when reviewing other laptops.
Thank you, I appreciate your candor. You’ve given me some things to think about.
As far as I remember, they do not disclose the Framework investment when reviewing other laptops.
When Linus is hosting a laptop review he always has a disclaimer about being a Framework investor. I’m not sure about videos hosted by others because it’s been a while since I’ve watched one but I don’t think they do since it was a personal investment.
Every video about a laptop I’ve seen since he invested has had the framework disclaimer, including multiple shortcircuits by Alex.
If Linus and his wife own 100% (or nearly 100%) of LMG, does it matter who invested in Framework? Especially when he has so much creative control?
At that point, just refer to the second half of my original replay. Though, if the investment is just a small part of something like an index fund, I’d say that concerns of bias probably aren’t warranted.
That part really bothered me, especially Linus’ words in the WAN show showing a complete disregard for the company and then auctioning off something they didn’t even own. I know if they were in America they’d likely be sued for defamation or something, I swear. If I were a company in that position I wouldn’t trust Linus with anything at all.
Left ltt a while ago. Been noticing he’s not paying his staff respectfully while showing off his custom home. Then you get into the errors that have been show just shows I got out in time.
He makes his video editors do manual labor for his home, like painting his walls and moving home furnitures. He is not known to be a respectful guy.
deleted by creator
Because they are editors and not handyman. Also there is most likely a huge issue with insurance when they do this kind of work which would not be covered by their contract/insurance.
As in unsubscribed from the channel or left a job?
Billet Lab’s statement (Update 3)
You, the PC community, are amazing. We’d like to thank you for your support, it means more than you can imagine.
Steve at Gamers Nexus has publicly shown his integrity, at the huge risk of backlash, and we have nothing but respect for him for how he’s handled himself, both publicly and when speaking directly to us.
…
Regarding LTT, we are simply going to state the relevant facts:
On 10th August, we were told by LTT via email that the block had been sold at auction. There was no apology.
We replied on 10th August within 30 minutes, telling LTT that this wasn’t okay, and that this was a £XXXX prototype, and we asked if they planned to reimburse us at all.
We received no reply and no offer of payment until 2 hours after the Gamers Nexus video went live on 14th August, at which point Linus himself emailed us directly.
The exact monetary value of the prototype was offered as reimbursement. We have not received, nor have we asked for any other form of compensation.
…
About the future of Billet Labs: We don’t plan to mourn our missing block, we’re already hard at work making another one to use for PC case development, as well as other media and marketing opportunities. Yes it sucks that the prototype has gone, it’s slowed us but has absolutely not stopped us. We have pre-orders for it, and plan to push ahead with our first production run as soon as we can.
We also have some exciting new products on our website that are available to buy now - we thank everyone who has bought them so far, and we can’t wait to see what you do with them.
We’re happy to answer any questions, but we won’t be commenting on LTT or the specifics of the email exchanges – we’re going to concentrate on making cool stuff, and innovative products (the Monoblock being just one of these).
…
We hope LTT implements the necessary changes to stop a situation like this happening again.
Peace out ✌
Felix and Dean
Billet Labs
Follow-up from Billet (Update 4)
UPDATE
For full transparency, Linus contacted us this evening saying it’s likely he can get the block back from the buyer.
We have declined this offer, and asked for the previously agreed monetary value instead for the following reasons:
-
we have already spent a significant percentage of the value of the block in the last few days on replacement parts to build a new block, assuming we’d never see the original one again.
-
we do not know if the original block is still in good working condition, and how much money will be needed to fix it if it’s not.
-
we don’t know if any of the bespoke fittings are missing, each of these costs money to replace if they are.
-
LTT have had our 3090ti without using it for 9 weeks, so we have lost confidence that they will return items quickly.
-
LTT isn’t currently in possession of the block, they’ve only said that they can get it back. We therefore don’t know when we’d get it back, and time is of the essence.
-
LTT has confirmed that the block is with a private individual rather than a rival company, so lost IP is much less of an issue.
We wanted to state this publicly just in case anyone has any issues with the fact that the block has potentially been found, and we chose to take the money instead. We hope you understand our reasoning here. We can have our new block that we’re currently making ready in the next couple of weeks, and we are sceptical that we would have the original block back in fully working condition in that amount of time – it would be a gamble at the very least.
Much love
Dean & Felix
-
That’s a class-act response.
In the “Statement from Linus” are LMG critising GN’s journalism for not reaching out before posting the video?
Seems like a good thing to do but would LMG have gotten enough context regarding the prototype water block? Seems even now they think that review was fair while knowingly using the wrong GPU. Fair for who?
Also he DIDNT “SELL” the prototype, he AUCTIONED it.
Said my 7 year old this weekend, and linus.
Seriously. Its excuses my kids use. “It was an accident”. “I misunderstood”. I didnt hit my brother, it was a love tap.
Especially because Steve said “auctioned” and not “sold”. Nice strawman, same as his “bad journalism” take. It only leads the discussion away from the allegations.
Either Linus thinks all his viewers are morons or he is mentally handicapped.
These sorts of folk ALWAYS think their viewers / fans are dumber than they are. They are the smartest person in the room, even if it’s just on a a screen.
Im gonna be honest and say i think most of his viewers are children or teens that dont have much in the way of life experience. Its pretty clear in just the long term ways he approaches stuff. Its cheeky and fun, sure, but its not a good example of how you do IT, tech or even personal computing. Its often reckless at best and kinda dangerous at worst. Like when he decided he didnt want a generator and decided to try and DIY a central UPS solution with little to no ventilation in a small closet. This was a LONG time ago, but it pretty much a fire hazard.
He also had a habit of just doing weird shit like mounting UPS systems above the servers, making the rack no only top heavy and possibly a tip hazard, but it allows for things like the UPS battery leaking caustic fluid to ruin the very devices hes seeking to protect…
The distinction Linus was trying to make there was that the proceeds were going to a charity and not to his pockets, as “sell” might imply.
Still a deflection, but not quite as infantile.
Maybe but the point is it’s a distinction without a difference or in his own words “it doesn’t matter the outcome is still the same”
He sold something that wasn’t his. If I donate my neighbors car to charity while it’s on loan to me, EVEN if I give him the money that was paid it’s still a dick move and illegal. And that is something that is replaceable with an actual market value.
And in this case it’s a prototype that is 1 of 1. This move caused real damage to another person/company.
Like I tell my kids “sorry doesn’t make it better or make things alright”. And in this case it straight up not good enough. Even a qualifier of “we put some controls in place to make sure this never happens again” is still not good enough. He’s not obsolved of the burden no matter how many times he claims he is.
Is it proven that the proceeds were going to charity ? Quite honestly I do not believe anything that LMG claims without proof at this point. Too much scummy behavior to give them any benefit of the doubt.
That doesn’t matter at all. I can’t steal something from you, then auction it off and say “All good, I gave the money to charity!”
Especially when I can then write of that donation from my taxes on top.
What you do with the money after selling it doesn’t actually matter.
Wait a sec, I’m gonna create a bunch of bot accounts just to up vote this higher.
*not gonna. I’m lazy, but it’d deserve it.
That’s a whole lot of excuses and no solutions.
Extremely disappointing.
Succinctly put. Linus doesn’t seem to acknowledge that there’s any problem you’re absolutely right. Seems to be in his own bubble I guess.
We MIGHT get an apology video, or one that serves a similar purpose without an actual apology, he will 100% roll his eyes on the WAN show if this is even brought up at all, and he won’t take any responsibility for any of it.
I hate this, I’ve enjoyed the entertainment aspect of LMG for a long time and seeing blatant mistakes get glossed over with one excuse after another is getting really old. this isn’t even the first time or second time this has happened.
The Narcissist’s Prayer (by Dayna Craig)
That didn’t happen. And if it did, it wasn’t that bad. And if it was, that’s not a big deal. And if it is, that’s not my fault. And if it was, I didn’t mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
Ring any bells?
The genocide denial thing is called Narcissist’s Prayer? Til
We’re between 4 and 5
I want to believe, but there’s still a bit of a lack of transparency, ironically when talking about transparency. He says things like “we’re internally working on it” but working on what? I at least want to hear what some even potential interventions could be.
You can really tell that Linus was the “dog ate my homework” from that post. Lots of blaming others.
Their website is down
Will be curious to hear Linus’ response, the Billet labs thing is super weird
Linus responded on their forum, he said it was a ‘mistake’ and that they’re gonna pay Billet Labs back for the prototype (trust me bro).
I would donate to a gofundme for Billet Labs to sue LTT tbh. Have been watching Linus since his ncix days but this behaviour is disguisting and his response just solidifies that LTT has gone down the shitter. Unsubscribed from all their channels.
He apparently posted on the forums: https://lemm.ee/comment/2246534
Been an LTT viewer since back in the Langley house days. As people, Linus and I are very similar (obviously based on his on camera personality, I of course have no idea what he’s like behind closed doors) and I can absolutely see how these mistakes were made. It’s incredibly disappointing to see that he’s not learning from them.
I’ve seen the asterisk corrections and the pinned comment corrections increase lately, but after watching GN’s video I realized that for every one I noticed there was a video where I hadn’t noticed. These corrections absolutely need to be resolved in production. I don’t care if it’s a crappy voice over where it’s incredibly obvious that it was dubbed in after, it just needs to be audibly corrected.
I get that they’re not always going to be caught before they go out the door, I’ve made egregious errors on stuff that I’ve looked over and other people have looked over many times to have it immediately called out on someone’s first glance. The videos with corrections need to be and should have been IMMEDIATELY privated, corrected, and have had a post stating the previous error and the new correction, at least for the big stuff. Small errors (like Linus mistakenly saying Ti on the 4070) I think is fine to be left in (with the asterisk or comment correction), as there wasn’t really any substantial change in the content. I do realize that this has man hour costs, but it’s absolutely imperative that their content is reliable if they’re trying to enter the testing market. For issues like the Billet labs monoblock, they should be taken down and have the entire thing reshot. With that situation however, it should’ve never made it to subscribers.
The issue of selling the billet labs monoblock is absolutely massive and inexcusable. There were so many places( where this could’ve and SHOULD HAVE been caught. The block should’ve NEVER been inventoried as their own, as it well, wasn’t. I’m guessing their inventory doesn’t have a distinction between their own stuff and stuff they’ve been lent (it all should be inventoried so it’s accounted for). Linus almost would’ve had to know about it being auctioned off, especially after making the (frankly kinda arrogant) distinction of saying it wasn’t “sold” but rather “auctioned”. It should’ve been caught there, it should’ve been caught by whoever sent the email to Billet confirming that they were going to return it, and it should’ve been caught by the inventory. I don’t blame whoever sent the email to be very clear, I’m saying that communication within the company needs to improve. This is very clearly an issue in viewer trust. It’s very hard to “trust me bro” when issues brought to his attention are not being taken seriously because it’d affect their bottom line rather than somebody else’s.
Honestly, Linus should follow GN’s lead and not do sponsors, merch messages, ads, anything for the WAN show this week. He needs to address it and address the plan for producing better content. I know his intentions are good. I know how easy it is to make horrible mistakes with good intentions by being completely ignorant in the situation.
POST “what do we do now” VIDEO: Realistically it looks like every concern that I raised here was addressed in the video that went out ~1 hour ago. I’m glad they made this video as well as the decision not to include sponsors (or the lack of ability for this video, but dbrand would’ve we all know that). Linus confirms that it was a knee jerk reaction to make the comment on the forums, as well as confirming my suspicions that nobody had seen the comment before he made it.
I hope we see improvements that continue and are upheld. I’m hopeful that they’ve properly used this as a learning opportunity, and will take time in the future to step back and see what’s new to learn.
Edit after reading Madison’s post:
Yikes. I’m now unsubscribed from all of their content.
Ltt has felt untrustworthy to me for a long time. I watched a smartphone review of theirs years ago, and they had made errors with specs and features. Watching their other (and older) smartphone reviews it felt like they would just copy last year’s review, make small changes and call it a new one. Calling old features new year after year, not mentioning key features, getting simple facts wrong. Decided to not trust any information in their videos after that
I fell off of Linus yeeeeeeeeears ago when him and Luke got to talking about harassment in League of Legends. Luke gave sensible advice, mute everyone, take breaks. Linus then rudely interjected “Or just get better”.
Sure getting better at league will reduce some harassment, but not all, and the way Linus interrupted Luke with that line left me with a subtext of, “People only flame you if you are bad, if you are bad it is your responsibility to git gud, if you are getting upset that people are flaming you, you’re a stupid ass bitch”
That made me feel like Linus wasn’t this happy-go-lucky tech enthusiast, but just another overconfident ego-driven asshole. Recent events are giving me some nice confirmation bias. Linus is now a money enthusiast, not a tech enthusiast anymore.
My anecdote is totally silly, I know, but cracks in Linus’ character can be seen outside of his reviews I suppose.
Just look at his profile on their forum. Dude is ego maniac and should be avoided as much as possible. Especially when lying at people and ruining other people work.
Same here. I liked their early content but it was obvious they crossed a line and everything new was driven by the dollar signs. If anything this GN video shows just how greedy Linus has become.
Tbh even when there aren’t such blatant errors in their reviews Linus has felt out of touch for years. Sometime in 2018 or 2019 (I don’t remember exactly when) Linus did a review of some $150 Alcatel phone and he kept complaining about how it had a micro USB charging port instead of type C, arguing how physical type C ports only cost “pennies” more than micro ports and how there was “nO eXcUsE” to still use micro USB. Mind you, type C had only started appearing on flagships around late 2016-17, so it hadn’t yet started to trickle down into the mid-range and budget segments of the market at that point. That made it all the more jarring to hear Linus ranting about a budget device still using micro USB only a couple of years after type C had even begun to see market adoption.
As someone who’s stuck to the low-mid end of the market (~$150-250) basically since getting my first smartphone, it was immediately obvious watching that video that Linus doesn’t know what the hell he was talking about when it came to tech outside of the high end, and expects every big new feature or standard to be crammed into budget devices regardless of the effects it might have on the final cost of said devices. Sure, type C ports only cost “pennies” more than micro-B ports at that time. But those extra pennies add up on devices that might only cost a handful of dollars to manufacture, plus the extra engineering and design work that has to be put in to implement it, and the added cost of type C cables over micro-B that would have to be included in the box.
After giving it some thought after watching that video, I started to gradually trust Linus less and less regarding anything budget of mid-range over the last 5-ish years before I unsubbed entirely last night. It sucks seeing a creator you respected so much at first go down this path, but I guess nothing can last forever.
https://youtu.be/4sAeslM74U8 My perspective about LTT changed after this video.
TLDW: Alex reviews a Thinkpad and asks Lenovo to remove the trackpoint
😯
The channel’s only good for their goofy shit now. Like jerry rigging a stupid, massively over-engineered cooling system to cool a server cabinet using a swimming pool.
There’s a lot of people here focussing on the biillit labs thing. While that is pretty bad on it’s own, and probably indicative of company or at least communication culture; Linus has not adressed the allegations regarding the sponsorships and the underlying conflict of interest. There’s some response to the error handling and sloppiness. But what is lacking is a clear identification and owning of errors as well as the accompanying, hard steps LMG will take to rectify them.
I would’ve liked to see a post saying" whow, this is a bit much at once, we will publish a full response with x/y plans in [a week]". This (Linus’ Forum response) just feels drama-inciting and not like a level-headed response.
What am I missing here? I’m a super casual watcher and even I knew he was an investor in framework? Every time I’ve seen the company mention he goes about how he’s involved. So yeah, not sure what the issue is there.
Watch GNs video. Steve goes through several instances where their handling of sponsorships is clearly inappropriate, beyond just investing in Framework.
The biggest problem Steve points out is that LTT content is clearly biased from the beginning. They know exactly what angle they’re pushing for before they start writing/testing the video. Whether they are Short Circuit videos where they wave away and even apologize for issues they find in their review-not-a-review, or whether it’s Linus’ own content decisons where he decides that he hates a product before even starting work on a video and so refuses to give that product a fair shake.
I honestly fully stand by GN in this and while I think LTT should have had the opportunity to respond to the allegations before the video went live, since this is the proper Journalistic thing to do, it should be considered that ltt has a huge audience and influence in the tech sphere so I can only assume GN didn’t want them to get ahead of the curve? It’s sad if it has come to this.
I also don’t know how exactly ltt could respond to the observations GN made since it’s a piece about what happened in videos they posted. They can’t really deny what happened. All they could do is lower their head and promise to do better.
Should all corporations get time to respond before going public with a criticism video to be proper journalism?
Yeah what was the justification for airing this out in public anyway? Seems like a private conversation should have happened first if his goal was trying to fix the sloppy LTT process. Then if no changes were made you can go public.
I just get the sense he wants the attention now… Which fair enough I guess? But rubs me the wrong way.
Haven’t been watching LTT (or GN) for a couple of years, but this made me go to LTT’s channel and unsub. Can’t believe what Linus has become. Love the thorough look into all this from Steve.
Why? This is a solid criticism, but I don’t think it warrants any kind of “revenge” or whatever. Just let LTT address it and hopefully be better going forward.
I would agree until it came to the blatant and grossly negligent mishandling of Billet Labs’ unique and one of a kind prototype. What they’ve done can’t be “addressed”. That can sink a smaller company that was depending on that hardware. And then LTT dared to drag them after completely fucking up their own process during the entire video.
Maybe it was more “I haven’t watched it in forever anyways, they seem to have crashed in quality anyways, might as well finally pull the plug from my sub”? Sounds like that to me, anyways.
Personally the last time I really watched LTT was when he started doing the idiot-face algorith-optimization, as in a lot of ways it heralded the shift towards a “proper” business over the more smallscale tech videos I enjoyed. It just felt too clean, too business, for me. I have the same problem with GN, obviously.
You summed it up pretty nicely why I unsubbed. The part “can’t believe what Linus has become” is mostly about how they handled Billet Labs.
Carighan’s answer to you sums it up why I unsubbed, not due to revenge (me unsubbing isn’t going to hurt them anyway). The comment about how Linus is now is due to how they handled Billet Labs and his answer to all that.
I find Linus to be an odd mix of earnest and smarmy.
Its narcissism.
The Narcissist’s Prayer (by Dayna Craig)
That didn’t happen. And if it did, it wasn’t that bad. And if it was, that’s not a big deal. And if it is, that’s not my fault. And if it was, I didn’t mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
Read that, then re-read his response to GN.
Many years ago when Linus started to aggressively use clickbait titles and thumbnails, people were pissed at the beginning but he said something like, Youtube is forcing them to do it…yeah right. That’s kinda when I stopped watching them, I wasn’t a big fan before anyway.
Besides the cooler block part, the most annoying one is that if you invest in companies, good for you but maybe at that point you should stop reviewing their products. You are not in a place where you can be objective anymore. They did that with Framework and I think he also has shares in AMD? He kept pumping them some time ago.
I see the vast majority of comments on the video are “ehhh, I watch them for entertainment”. I don’t find them at all entertaining and I actively avoid their channels because 99% of the time, the information presented is very generic or has nothing to do with the product. Plus the atrocious thumbnails/titles…
When. You set aside integrity for fortune, you don’t get to complain about it. You’ve made a choice, just like I choose to turn it off
As far as I know, he has never had AMD stock.
Personally I don’t see the framework investment as an overwhelming conflict of interest. It’s an amount of money that’s not excessive for him(using the figures from the GN video), so if it were to vanish it wouldn’t be life changing. It’s also unlikely to be a life changer for him if it were to 10x. It sounds like even if it were to 100x, it would only increase his net worth by 20%.
It’s disclosed frequently and the investment is very public, so the viewer knows to be aware of that potential bias.
The much larger issues are the countless errors in the video that can mislead millions of viewers with bad data and poor testing oversight… and of course how those errors are handled once they are pointed out. I’d wager 95% of viewers would never read a pinned comment. These errors and their treatment cast doubt on the multi million dollar investment into a lab dedicated to guiding purchasing decisions.
Sorry, I’m totally out of the loop. I know Linus, but can anyone summarize what is the problem with billet labs?
deleted by creator
Can you explain to me how auctioning something that they do not own is a mistake and not malice ? They knew they are being scummy doing that. Especially after the producer asked for it back AND they agreed to send it back. That is like robbing a bank and then saying “come on guys. was the heat of the moment. We didn’t think robbing a bank was THAT bad”
Lying to someone and selling someone elses property is not a ''mistake". That is a crime.
deleted by creator
I’m working in a company with over 10000 employees. Nobody would ever “accidentally” sell a prototype from another company. Let alone lie to that company about sending it back.
That’s easy. An item made its way to logistics, got mislabelled by someone who wasn’t concentrating or who didn’t know better, item landed in an auction. Apparently LMG needs a better system of internal communication or more micro managing from someone in marketing or communications for handling incoming and outcoming items.
An easy example would be if you forgot a personal book at the library, a librarian mistook it for donation, and then your book becomes catalogued. It doesn’t have to be malicious.
deleted by creator
Okay yes by accident the item could land with items to be auctioned off unintentionally. How could it have been there though ? LTT literally told the guys that they send the piece back and that there would be a tracking link soon. Things don’t add up.
So item was accidentally gone and then they tried to lie to the owner of the item by telling them it is on its way back ? Sounds like cheap excuses from LTT for fucking up on a gigantic scale.
It was a fuck up, yes. Probably without malicious intent, but still a fuck up.
How is straight up lying to someone not malice? You don’t lie by accident
Walk me there please, which lie are you talking about?
If they had a history of malice then it would make sense to assume it was on purpose instead of being a major screw up.
Linus tested it on the wrong GPU, then stole one of their prototypes and gave it out at LTX
deleted by creator
