• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    Since we want the genocide to end before all Palestinians are dead it is not useful to demand that Harris calls the genocide a genocide

    Fucking liberalism in a nutshell.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        So you’re looking at a criticism of liberalism, from the left of liberalism. Namely the socialist left, I am assuming. Socialists can be very critical of liberals, as liberalism is a part of the establishment, and has a long history of caving to right wing framing of issues (since the right wing is also (largely) liberalism, albeit “classical liberal.” In this case critical of the “its not practical” preconception that gives ground (literally) to the perpetuators of this genocide.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      No, it’s utility. The idea that we can achieve our goals despite not currently having leftists and socialists in power. Not wanting to get your hands dirty isn’t even a political position.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          I will wait until she gets elected, and then if she continues to refuse to call it a genocide, then I will hold her accountable then.

          But first, the existence of Palestine as contingent on her winning. Like literally.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      As opposed to? Conservatism? How do you expect that to be different? Because in terms of president, those are your two options right now.