an_onanist@lemmy.world to Political Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoTake that pesky liberals!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square450fedilinkarrow-up1790arrow-down1141
arrow-up1649arrow-down1imageTake that pesky liberals!lemmy.worldan_onanist@lemmy.world to Political Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square450fedilink
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down7·edit-215 hours agoLibs would rather make fun of their genocide that they’re funding than resist it. That’s literally why nobody votes for y’all creeps.
minus-squarephoneymouse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-24 hours agoI’m think you’re missing the point. You face three choices: Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening. Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically. Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.
Libs would rather make fun of their genocide that they’re funding than resist it.
That’s literally why nobody votes for y’all creeps.
I’m think you’re missing the point.
You face three choices:
Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.
Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.