• 17 Posts
  • 1.72K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle




  • I’m think you’re missing the point.

    You face three choices:

    1. Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening
    2. Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening
    3. Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening.

    Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.

    Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.


  • I’m think you’re missing the point.

    You face three choices:

    1. Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening
    2. Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening
    3. Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening.

    Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.

    Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.


  • I’m think you’re missing the point.

    You face three choices:

    1. Most death and harm, 50% chance of happening
    2. Less death and harm, 50% chance of happening
    3. Principled choice for no death and harm, but that practically makes choice 1 more likely to happen because it has 0 chance of happening.

    Choosing choice 3 is equivalent to choosing choice 1 because you’re contributing to choice 1 happening practically.

    Choosing choice 3 is directly creating more death and harm than choosing choice 2 and in that way is morally worse.