• Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    Here are some numbers to consider.

    The US sold $441 billion worth of goods and services to Canada in 2024.

    Canada sold $482 billion worth of goods and services to the US in 2024.

    The US has a populating of 334.9 million people.

    Canada has a population of 40.1 million people.

    Per capita, every American man, woman, and child spent $1,316.81 on Canadian goods and services.

    Candians spent $12,019. 95 on American good and services.

    Who isn’t pulling their weight in this trading relationship?

    This isn’t about illegal immigration and it isn’t about the 20 lbs of fentanyl that tried to cross the border from Canada.

    This is about the billionaire class raising taxes on the poor and raising prices for Americans.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    I wonder how long Trump and his buddies are going to be able to ignore the mess they are making of the stock market now which hurts his businesses world supporters. It certainly is going to hurt US car companies hard.

  • kanata@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    How are you going to have a trade war with a superpower? it’s just a losing battle and it will hurt regular Canadians the most.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    Congrats Trump and his buddies, you managed to not only save Trudeau but make the nation rally behind him out of national pride and defense.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a Canadian, I’ve already seen my nearest grocery store put up labels on shelves like “made in Canada” and aside from pricing it is gonna make it easier to avoid American products

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isn’t it great that a narcissistic jackass with no understanding of economics is Duning-Krogering all to death?

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Trump is so horrible he got Americans to side with the country putting retaliatory tariffs on them.

    Also it should be pointed out that Trump essentially declared war on an ally because he wanted to seize Canadian land.

    Any talk about drug trafficking is silly since the first thing Trump did was pardon one of the biggest drug traffickers in the world, Ross Ulbricht

      • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Trump isn’t trying to fix things. He is trying to break it all and end up a dictator. He isn’t healthy so he wont live long enough to enjoy being a despot like putin. Trump honestly can’t see his own death. Few can. That narcissist will die with a surprised look on his face. His father lived a long time but he wasn’t a overweight coke head.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We are actually seeing the us get destroyed by a mad king. Never let conservatives forget that they ushered in a man who intentionally tried to destroy their country.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes, yes, but “Daddy’s home, you guys! And he has his belt off! Yah-fucking-hoooooo! 'merica gunna be so gud noaw! Egg prices? What egg prices? Everything else is even more expensive, too, but we were for low prices before we were AGAINST them!”

      This gives stupid people a real chubby, so we should all have to suffer for their stupid feels.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not just the Conservatives; there’s always a cohort of Democrats willing to side with Republicans to make sure the worst ideas make it across the finish line.

      Dema haven’t been “on our side” for decades. They’re too busy milking the corporate teat.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They are both bad and have a massive overlap. But yes one party is clearly better and at least tries to help however flawed it may be.

          Still both Dems and Republicans are ruled by the elite and the interests of the oligarchy. That’s clear and part of the problem. Until we change how our elections work though it’s in everyone’s best interest to vote for the democratic party

          • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 minutes ago

            All governments are ruled by those who stand out. They aren’t going to pay much heed to some guy who lives in a trailer or dirt farmer.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Still both Dems and Republicans are ruled by the elite and the interests of the oligarchy.

            Weird that the last 3 Dem presidents raised taxes on the wealthy and/or corporations. Didn’t know that the oligarchy was interested in that.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Not sure there is a change to elections that will help. Homo sapiens became the dominant species by a tendency toward small group loyalty. That will be exploitable as long after you and I are dead I figure. Our best hope is a benevolent AI takeover. How sad is that.

            • LePoisson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I think ranked choice voting would help a lot. Then we could vote 3rd party without doing the equivalent of lighting that vote on fire. Right now it just makes no sense to vote anything other than Dem or Repub when you’re voting. Just because enough voters are only voting one or the other regardless of policies and beliefs and we’re not convincing enough of those folks to change their vote.

              I am sincerely on the robots side in the future robot war against humanity. May they take mercy on our souls and save us from ourselves.

              • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 minutes ago

                I used to favor Ranked Choice voting, but someone on lemmy linked me this and I’m a STAR voting fan now.

                Not that Ranked Choice voting isn’t a million times better then First-past-the-post voting.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They should have made it 26%. Trump wouldn’t be able to resist upping it to 27%, and they could just spend a day reaching the logical, yet stupid, conclusion to this mess.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Kamala would have been at best delaying the inevitable. The DNC is not capable of meaningfully changing fast enough to react to the growing threat of fascism.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If this escalates, wait until Canada decides to stop buying US made weapon systems. It will be expensive and time consuming to retrain, but the US is not a reliable defense partner under the neo-Nazi GOP. The US MIC must see the writing on the wall.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    American here.

    Don’t counter with tarrifs. Counter with embargoes. Trump loaded you a gun and handed it to you. Pull the fucking trigger already.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Counter by decriminalizing everything to do with violations of US intellectual property. Ignore all US patents. Let Canadian drug companies make pharmaceuticals without having to pay for a US license. Let repair shops disable the DRM systems that prevent HP printers from accepting any old generic ink. Let Canadian broadcasters show US movies and TV shows without kicking back money to Hollywood. Let Canadian farmers repair their tractors without first kicking back money to John Deere. Allow anybody who wants to to jailbreak iPhones, and sell kits that allow other people to do that. Free Canadians from having to kick 30% of every purchase back to Apple in California.

      • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That was Cory Doctorow’s recent take on it too. Trump just threw out the trade agreement with Canada and Mexico he was so proud to say was his accomplishment, after renegotiating NAFTA. They really should say fine, stew in your own mess. Ignore patents, crank out cheap pharmaceuticals, forget about DRM. Nationalize US factories on their soil. Will hurt for a while until new trade is established, but there is the whole rest of the planet to trade with.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Nationalize US factories on their soil

          This is extreme and could warrant an invasion from the US. Wars have been fought for less. Look at what happened to Guatemala when they wanted to take back some of the half off their farmland owned by Chiquita.

          Canada is a mid-sized power but not really in a position to flaunt US power like that

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Canada is part of Nato. Isn’t trump going to leave Nato? So that would mean all of Nato would be on Canada’s side. That is one hell of a leg to stand on.

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Nato doesn’t have the navy to help Canada in a fight. Assuming America isn’t torn apart by a civil war as factions of the military defects and there’s a revolution in the streets. (60/40 at that point. Fighting a century old ally is a red line that would absolutley cause a civil war)

              the US navy would chuckle as the french and british and other relevant navies lie at the bottom of the atlantic. And at that point, Russia moves in and Europe is in a land war while the US decides to partner with Russia.

              • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 minutes ago

                Britain and France also have thermonuclear weapons. Britain has Vanguard-class ballistic missile submarines and France has Triomphant class ballistic missile submarines, and both have nuclear capable fighters and bombers. If Europe is to fall - let the whole world fall with it.

          • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I know, it’s a nuclear option. Seriously shouldn’t put that card down right off. And yeah, hasn’t gone well for any central or south american government that the US has destabilized or overthrown due to some large corporation’s interests. But as all this garbage escalates, bringing up the possibility could make owners and shareholders squirm a bit. It hurts them financially, the only thing that would make them care. People who Trump might (might, small chance) listen to. But before that point? Those companies can produce all kinds of things. Doesn’t mean Canada or Mexico have to let those goods go out across their borders. Their trade agreement has been torn up by Trump again. And you know that bureaucracy is complicated, things get held up in customs sometimes, occasionally for very very long times. Paperwork gets lost… When companies here in the US are screaming about their supply lines breaking down again, now because of HIS stupid tariff war, there will be some negative political fallout. Trump’s ego and image are vulnerable things despite all the bluster. He won’t back down, but he could pivot to something else and let this nonsense drop.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          the rest of the world is too chicken shit. there is no rest of the world to trade with as the us cries to everyone that they need to embargo nation X.

      • Dumpdog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I wish this comment (merc’s comment) would get bumped to the top of every post related to the tariffs. Tit for tat tariffs is stupid with predictable results. Strategic tariffs and other targeted mean of retaliation are better. Why is there only a 10% tariff on oil? Because the US needs Canada’s oil. You fuck with our economy we fuck with the resources we give you at a discounted rate. Look at CUSMA (hehe. or NAFTA or whatever broken trade agreement that was) and target the industries that the (US) wanted to protect.

        And for people using the tired fight analogies - just because someone tries to punch you in the face doesn’t mean you punch them back in the face. You have already been training to kick them in the fucking balls.

        Tit for tat tariffs is just political posturing for weak leadership.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Also, this is a fight against a much bigger opponent. Not only is the US population 10x bigger and their economy more than 10x bigger, that size means they have a lot more trade partners, whereas Canada is pretty isolated and trades mostly with the US.

          If you’re up against a much stronger opponent in a life-or-death fight, you don’t fight fair.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We’re doing both. Both BC and Ontario are cutting off American Booze. That’s gonna hurt American company’s hard.

      My hope if Trump keeps it up we cut off the power, and better yet the gas. Although that might make him try to invade or something.

      Up next will be him calling Canadians Nazis and trying to annex Quebec.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I get what you’re saying, but the US being Canada’s biggest trading partner would absolutely destroy Canadian economy right together with the US economy

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The Canadian economy will be ruined by any kind of half-measures.

        Don’t negotiate with a fascist state. Cut them off, recall ambassadors, and cease all joint military operations.

        Trump will never do anything to benefit Canada, so why give him an ounce of cooperation?

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Our only reliable allies. Europeans and the Pacific Partners like Australia, NZ, Japan and South Korea… are all oceans away. The US has by overwhelming force, the largest navy in the world. Only China, who we don’t want to dive into the arms of and become a puppet of, even remotely stands a chance.

          Our allies aren’t going to rush to our aid in a worst case scenario, because they can’t get across the atlantic. and they’re also preoccupied with more or less being de-facto at war with the Russian Federation right now. and they are still not taking it seriously that they may have to fight for real over there.

          When you start doing things like you’re suggesting. That is absolutely going to be seen as a hostile act by the US, and they will manufacture consent for war.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Because we still need our own economy?

          If Canada 100% stops trading with the US it will wreck havoc on the economy. Sure, it’ll hurt the US too, and yes, it’s a fascist state at this point, but you still gotta live, eat, etc…

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Brother, your economy is getting gigafucked by Trump either way.

            You can slow-roll it, with the impact lasting decades, or the world can sign up for one shitty month that will result in Trump being neutered by Congressional Republicans who are terrified of 2026.

            • sibachian@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              the world has too many right wing govs currently to handle any fallout form such efforts. they no doubt don’t see benefits; they just have no idea how to actually govern and are just in it for the cash.

            • kava@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Brother, your economy is getting gigafucked by Trump either way.

              If someone shoots at you, you don’t shoot yourself in the foot to spite them. Canada is reliant on US trade. Cutting it off entirely would cause a serious economic shockwave that’s hard to understate.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You know what’s frustrating in all that? Is that our leaders won’t do jack shit to diversify the economy.

        Nothing has changed much during COVID and nothing will change now.

        People will suffer and nothing will change.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Countries trade with the countries closest to them because the realities of logistics overpower politics or whatever ideals people might have. There are a few exceptions of course. Cuba doesn’t do a lot of trade with the countries closest to them. But they aren’t doing that well. The UK had an idea about diversifying their trade to be more about trade with non-european countries, but that didn’t go well either.

          Geography is a bitch. You can’t physically move a country to another part of the globe, you have to deal with the countries near to you whether you like it or not.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So from the conservative viewpoint, what is the rationale for the tariffs? Are people really supposed to believe it has something to do with fentanyl? Like do conservatives actually believe that or is there some other narrative besides Donald Trump is looking to flex his power?

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      or is there some other narrative

      I believe a couple different things

      a) he’s intentionally weakening the US economy to both weaken establishment institutions and spread mass discontent. he wants people nice and angry and fearful for the future. so when he takes more extreme actions later on, it doesn’t seem as bad. also he’s probably preparing for some sort of riot movement that includes political violence in the next couple years. as the establishment gets weaker, he’ll be in a better position to essentially ignore them. so for example Supreme Court says something unconstitutional? Maybe he just ignores it and enforces his will regardless

      b) in the near future we may see a serious decoupling of the US economy from the world. maybe it’s due a planned war or some other circumstance and this is in preparation for that. tariffs tend to cut off the economy from the outside world. it’ll hurt less later on if we do some of it now

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not conservatism, it’s fascism. The strongman says jump and those loyal to him say “how high?” even when he’s being stupid. There is no analysis of Trump’s actions or why people go along with it beyond that.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      For the most part it’s not getting the kind of attention you might expect, they are seeing this as all “part of the plan” and celebrating their great trade-warrior leader punishing the “bad guys” and the white house has deliberately withheld a LOT of the information about what’s going on. Most of the breaking stories we’ve gotten have been from foreign press. We didn’t even hear the tariff schedule until fucking France media issued stories.

      There is not going to be the satisfaction we all hope for, not until there’s literally a new dust-bowl as we get ravaged by a new great depression, which as bad as it could be, might be our only hope for a more balanced political system going forward. I hate that these clowns have made me into an accelerationist but here are.

    • pacology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Back in 1890, there was no income tax. The federal government was funded through tariffs. With the upcoming rewrite of the tax code, the current administration needs new revenue, and trariffs are one of the few the president cab levy unilaterally.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Tariffs are essentially a shitty sales tax. I’ve read it described as a way to switch the US federal funding from I come tax to a hidden sales tax.

        The revenues will also be much much lower, which is why they need to eliminate every federal bureau.

    • rabber@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah I’m confused because this is going to ruin American billionaires. Doesn’t maga worship billionaires?

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If you have the money to ride it out you can buy the country for pennies on the dollar.

        • Dumpdog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I had to chuckle about this comment. I said that same thing in a rant to family and friends last night including using the words “for pennies on the dollar”

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Grow a spine and make it 100 percent. The quicker trumps masters learn it wont work the better.