• relay@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 months ago

    Choose 1

    Subsidize unhealthy foods like sugar to make profits for agriculture corporations

    Have a population of fit and healthy people to train for battle

      • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        it will be political suicide for whichever party decides to do it

        The Democrats will do it.

        And if that drives off the libs, the Republicans will make boogeyman noises or proffer the idea of Trump being able to get a 3rd term. And the liberals will rally round their blue-no-matter-who chant even as their children get carted off to whatever fucky warmongering the US is getting involved in next.

        • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s absolutely how it will go if the US decides it needs the draft.

          Some straw man will be created as the new “threat to democracy”. Could be Trump, could be whoever else.

          If people are already willing to vote for actual genocide just to keep out trump, the draft wouldn’t be such a stretch. Just implement a system where you can make a “freedom donation” to exempt your family and rich white liberal families would have no objections.

      • SadArtemis🏳️‍⚧️@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        What else are people gonna choose? Third party? Hell, they’re already dismantling what limited, farcical “democracy” exists in many people’s eyes by conducting lawfare against and trying to prevent their primary political opponent (Trump) from running.

        Not disagreeing with anything you said, but I expect beatings will continue until morale improves (or something explodes). There is no political will amongst the establishment for anything but a continued march to destruction- unrestrained imperialist hegemonic behavior abroad, neoliberal societal destruction at home.

      • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No, it isn’t. At least in the Navy. That is what boot camp is for. Because they are so desperate, they have very low expectations for physical fitness and plenty of wavers if you have any reason preventing you from signing on.

    • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Standing behind every person willing to join the military is 15 chuds wearing American flag t-shirts glorifying US troops while being too big of cowards to actually join. lol

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The cuts will mainly be in already-empty posts — not actual soldiers — including in jobs related to counter-insurgency that swelled during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars but are not needed as much today. About 3,000 of the cuts would come from Army special operations forces.

    No actual soldiers lost from the ranks.

    According to the plan, the Army will cut about 10,000 spaces for engineers and similar jobs that were tied to counter-insurgency missions. An additional 2,700 cuts will come from units that don’t deploy often and can be trimmed, and 6,500 will come from various training and other posts.

    Desk riding soldiers positions cut.

    There also will be about 10,000 posts cut from cavalry squadrons, Stryker brigade combat teams, infantry brigade combat teams and security force assistance brigades, which are used to train foreign forces.

    Actual direct combat troops positions cut.

    In response, the service launched a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting last fall to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers. And it is forming a new professional force of recruiters, rather than relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

    HAHA… professional recruiters instead of soldiers doing a recruiter duty rotation… what could go wrong?

    Potential Enlistee: “So, have you been to combat?”

    Recruiter: “No.”

    Potential Enlistee: “So… um…how long have you been in?”

    Recruiter: “Oh… about six months”

    Potential Enlistee: “No, I mean, how long have you been in the Army, no just doing recruiting duty?”

    Recruiter: “Oh… I enlisted to be a Recruiter and got out of AIT six months ago. Was assigned to this desk after I graduated and have been here since”

    Potential Enlistee: “…”

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Stryker brigade combat teams

      Wait, didn’t they make a big show of those? Claiming they’re some kinda new and unique invention in military science and whatnot?

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Iraq for sure and possibly Afghanistan.

        They were supposed to be a rapid deployment moderately armored infantry delivery and support platform.

        Turns out they are just an extremely large and unweildy truck with a big gun on top that you can’t often use without killing your dismounts.

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    my guess is they intentionally let recruiting lapse. COD is still the most popular game RN.

    • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, because gamers are so well known for their support of getting off their ass and doing real things. Lmao.