• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I once encountered a theory that North American english was potentially closer to historical english because it was less influenced by neighboring countries. I doubt that, now. But it’s an interesting idea.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      North American French is like that

      It is much more formal and traditional compared to France French (No idea about Haiti)

      Because of laws preventing loan words

    • comador @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      As a yank who lived in the UK (East Sussex) for several years, I can share the sentiments of my mates there that they believe we Americans still speak a more traditional version of the language than they do now. Specifically pronunciation of words.

      For example, Americans have retained the pronunciation of the final “r” in words like “father” and “mother,” while the UK has dropped it. Americans have maintained the “flat a” sound of cat in words like “path” and “class” whereas the UK has mostly replaced that sound with the “broad a” of “father.”

      It’s not an exact science, but the rate of change in the language there has gone beyond the 18th century version we Americans still speak today and thus, it can be said American English, at least pronunciation, is more traditional.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Then there’s the people who say Shakespeare makes much more sense, flows better, and better play on words when spoken with an older UK accent (or Irish?), so nothing like North American.

      (Lots of search results but no easy blurb to read on what it was. But I recall hearing some and it was nothing like North American accent.)