There are no counter arguments, its just what you find important as a person. If you dont care about the social and human aspect of making things and just want to consume, like a quick microwavedinner, then any counter argument wont hold any ground to you.
And on a side note, pretending you are an artist while using AI is just like pretending you are a chef while preparing a microwavedinner.
I think it counts as art if there’s any amount of human creative input, so if someone picks out an image they think looks cool and writes an imaginative caption for it, that’s art even if they didn’t draw that image
Getting decent output from AI is an art in ofitself. A lot of tinkering with parameters, getting close then trying again. Taking a good output, pulling it into an image editor to fix the broken bits, sometimes repeating that process multiple times until you get what you’re looking for.
I think in the long run it’ll be a tool that artists use, much like many digital artists today use tools that once were considered to be antithetical and unreconcilable with art
Its ai generated, so either none or all of them.
N/A bc it isn’t art if its made by AI
I honestly don’t care who made the art as long as it looks good. I’ll get downvoted a lot, but I’d just like to hear a counterargument for my opinion.
There are no counter arguments, its just what you find important as a person. If you dont care about the social and human aspect of making things and just want to consume, like a quick microwavedinner, then any counter argument wont hold any ground to you.
And on a side note, pretending you are an artist while using AI is just like pretending you are a chef while preparing a microwavedinner.
If the microwavedinner is good, even if it’s in a fancy restarant I’d eat it.
I think it counts as art if there’s any amount of human creative input, so if someone picks out an image they think looks cool and writes an imaginative caption for it, that’s art even if they didn’t draw that image
Getting decent output from AI is an art in ofitself. A lot of tinkering with parameters, getting close then trying again. Taking a good output, pulling it into an image editor to fix the broken bits, sometimes repeating that process multiple times until you get what you’re looking for.
I think in the long run it’ll be a tool that artists use, much like many digital artists today use tools that once were considered to be antithetical and unreconcilable with art
Thats indeed part of the joke