• evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think that’s more about Iran wanting uranium and not so much Canada’s nuclear weapons program.

        • Forester@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          What? It only takes time and effort and a few hundred million dollars of non-tampered machinery.

          • marcos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            You need a reasonably capable semiconductor industry or partnership with somebody that has one.

            I do think Iran has both of those, but I’m not an expert. Anyway, they had a major setback once because they were relying on electronics trafficked from Germany.

            • Forester@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              That’s not how stuxnet works. I’m not a tanky by any means. I’m an American and we had to hire a swedish operative to infiltrate their closed Gap systems and insert a rubber ducky. The problem wasn’t that the machinery came from Germany. The problem was we paid off a swedish guy to rape the software.

              https://youtu.be/UtFqtA0X_hM

              • marcos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 minutes ago

                Do you think Chinese military ADCs are vulnerable to Windows 0-day attacks?

                People would have a much harder time if Iran had a proper sourcing of their equipment.